Gomes, D. M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Calvillo, D. P. (2016). Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions. Legal and criminological psychology, 21(2), 319-331. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12068
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationGomes, Dayna M., Douglas M. Stenstrom, and Dustin P. Calvillo. "Examining the Judicial Decision to Substitute Credibility Instructions for Expert Testimony on Confessions." Legal and Criminological Psychology 21, no. 2 (2016): 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12068.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationGomes, Dayna M., et al. "Examining the Judicial Decision to Substitute Credibility Instructions for Expert Testimony on Confessions." Legal and Criminological Psychology, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 319-331, https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12068.