Forensic psychiatric experts under the legal microscope

Purpose. We examined how 157 legal professionals view the role and performance of forensic psychiatric experts (psychiatrists and psychologists) in court, and what experiences they have with the experts. Methods. The participants filled in an online survey with ratings and open-ended questions. Resu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Grønnerød, Cato (Autor)
Otros Autores: Grøndahl, Pål ; Stridbeck, Ulf
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2016
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2016, Volumen: 21, Número: 1, Páginas: 15-24
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1846920256
003 DE-627
005 20230531154633.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230530s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12037  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846920256 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846920256 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Grønnerød, Cato  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Forensic psychiatric experts under the legal microscope  |c Cato Grønnerød, Pål Grøndahl and Ulf Stridbeck 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 23-24 
500 |a Gesehen am 30.05.2023 
500 |a First published: 10 December 2013 
520 |a Purpose. We examined how 157 legal professionals view the role and performance of forensic psychiatric experts (psychiatrists and psychologists) in court, and what experiences they have with the experts. Methods. The participants filled in an online survey with ratings and open-ended questions. Results. Their experience was fairly limited, but the general impression was one of overall satisfaction with the experts. Experience was not only valued but also clarity in language and presentation were important, together with verifiability and thoroughness. The ability or willingness to express doubt was also emphasized. In addition, a significant proportion felt they had observed differences between psychologists and psychiatrists, and they preferred psychiatrists based on a perception of higher professional skills. Conclusions. Despite media uproars after controversial cases, the Norwegian system of court-appointed experts received a positive review from the legal professionals; they report an overall positive experience with forensic psychiatric experts. 
650 4 |a Legal practitioners 
650 4 |a Forensic psychiatry 
650 4 |a Forensic Psychology 
650 4 |a Expertise 
650 4 |a Testimony 
700 1 |a Grøndahl, Pål  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stridbeck, Ulf  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 21(2016), 1, Seite 15-24  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:15-24 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12037  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12037  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4326862270 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846920256 
LOK |0 005 20230616154124 
LOK |0 008 230530||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw