Investigating deception in second language speakers: interviewee and assessor perspectives

Purpose. The first of two experiments investigated the effect that speaking in a non-native language has on interviewees’ perceptions of their interview experience. A second experiment investigated evaluators’ perceptions of the credibility of interviewees who spoke in their native or non-native lan...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Akehurst, Lucy (Author)
Contributors: Arnhold, Alina ; Figueiredo, Isabel ; Turtle, Sarah ; Leach, Amy-May
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
In: Legal and criminological psychology
Year: 2018, Volume: 23, Issue: 2, Pages: 230-251
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1846256011
003 DE-627
005 20230531145804.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230526s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12127  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846256011 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846256011 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Akehurst, Lucy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Investigating deception in second language speakers  |b interviewee and assessor perspectives  |c Lucy Akehurst, Alina Arnhold, Isabel Figueiredo, Sarah Turtle and Amy-May Leach 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 247-250 
500 |a Gesehen am 26.05.2023 
500 |a First published: 25 March 2018 
520 |a Purpose. The first of two experiments investigated the effect that speaking in a non-native language has on interviewees’ perceptions of their interview experience. A second experiment investigated evaluators’ perceptions of the credibility of interviewees who spoke in their native or non-native language. Method. For the first experiment, 52 participants told the truth or lied about their identity during a mock border control interview. All of the participants were interviewed in English, for half of the sample this was their native language, and for the other half of the sample English was not their native tongue. Post-interview, all participants completed a self-report questionnaire relating to their perceptions of their interview experience. For the second experiment, 128 participants evaluated the credibility of interviewees from the first experiment. The modality of presentation of interview clips was varied and included ‘Visual and Audio’, ‘Visual Only’, ‘Audio Only’, and ‘Transcript Only’. Results. Non-native speakers were more likely than native speakers to report being nervous and cognitively challenged during their interviews and were more likely to monitor their own behaviour. Overall, evaluators were better able to distinguish between truth tellers and liars who were speaking in their native language than between truth tellers and liars who were non-native speakers. Relative to native speakers, there was a smaller truth bias for evaluations of non-native speakers. When evaluators were considering the non-native speakers, they achieved higher discrimination accuracy when they were exposed to ‘Visual Only’ or ‘Transcript Only’ presentations than when they were shown the ‘Visual and Audio’ or ‘Audio Only’ interview clips. Conclusions. Self-reported experiences of a mock border control interview differed dependent on whether interviewees were speaking in their native or non-native language. Discrimination accuracy was better for native speakers than it was for non-native speakers and was at its worst when evaluators heard the accents of the non-native speakers. 
650 4 |a non-native language 
650 4 |a Deception 
650 4 |a investigative interviews 
650 4 |a Border control 
650 4 |a Perceptions 
700 1 |a Arnhold, Alina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Figueiredo, Isabel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Turtle, Sarah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Leach, Amy-May  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 23(2018), 2, Seite 230-251  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:230-251 
856 |u https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/files/9003660/Investigating_deception_in_second_language.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12127  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12127  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 23  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 230-251 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325489789 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846256011 
LOK |0 005 20230616152904 
LOK |0 008 230526||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw