The psychological impact of solitary: a longitudinal comparison of general population and long-term administratively segregated male inmates

Purpose. This study expands upon existing research on the psychological impact of administrative segregation on inmates by addressing several methodological limitations in this body of literature. Methods. Using a pre–post design, this study compared male general population (GP) inmates in the Unite...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chadick, Carly D. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Batastini, Ashley B. ; Levulis, Samuel J. ; Morgan, Robert D.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2018
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2018, Volumen: 23, Número: 2, Páginas: 101-116
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Administrative segregation
Solitary Confinement
psychological impairment
Mental Health
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose. This study expands upon existing research on the psychological impact of administrative segregation on inmates by addressing several methodological limitations in this body of literature. Methods. Using a pre–post design, this study compared male general population (GP) inmates in the United States to those with up to 4 years in segregated placement across scores on the MCMI-III. Results. While segregated inmates reported higher levels of distress (particularly on measures of anxiety, depressed mood, post-traumatic stress, and somatic complaints) compared to the GP at post-assessment, scores did not reach the clinical cut-off. Further, inmates generally did not deteriorate as time in restrictive housing increased. Conclusions. Thus, compared to the GP, who showed some improvement in functioning, segregated inmates remained largely the same. Rather than causing significant psychological damage, it is more likely that segregation is a barrier to opportunities for continued growth. Study limitations and recommendations for reforms in the use of segregation are presented.
Notas:Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 113-116
Gesehen am 26.05.2023
First published: 22 February 2018
ISSN:2044-8333
DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12125