The usefulness of examining terrorists’ rhetoric for understanding the nature of different terror groups

This study advances a distinction between two generic types of terrorists’ rhetoric: (1) ideological rhetoric candidly reflecting the terrorists’ genuine beliefs and values regarding their military targeting policy (who is a legitimate target), even when adopting such rhetoric involves high image/di...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Honig, Or Arthur (Author) ; Reichard, Ariel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
In: Terrorism and political violence
Year: 2019, Volume: 31, Issue: 4, Pages: 759-778
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 4500
001 1846232449
003 DE-627
005 20230525153742.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230525s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09546553.2017.1283308  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846232449 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846232449 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Honig, Or Arthur  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1156877814  |0 (DE-627)1019838922  |0 (DE-576)502481323  |4 aut 
109 |a Honig, Or Arthur  |a Honig, Or  |a Honig, Artur-Or 
245 1 4 |a The usefulness of examining terrorists’ rhetoric for understanding the nature of different terror groups  |c Or Honig and Ariel Reichard 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 25.05.2023 
500 |a Published online: 14 Feb 2017 
520 |a This study advances a distinction between two generic types of terrorists’ rhetoric: (1) ideological rhetoric candidly reflecting the terrorists’ genuine beliefs and values regarding their military targeting policy (who is a legitimate target), even when adopting such rhetoric involves high image/diplomatic costs; and (2) a PR-oriented rhetoric which consciously misrepresents the terrorists’ intentions and behavior in an attempt to project a more benign and humane image, thus maintaining sympathy and rebuffing criticism. We contend that such a distinction can provide a highly useful metric for assessing terrorists groups’ rationality and pragmatism: the most pragmatic groups will shift between these two types of rhetoric depending on changing strategic needs. To show the practical usefulness of this distinction we provide criteria for categorizing terrorists’ rhetorical responses to (mostly liberal-minded) criticism that they have killed innocent civilians in their enemy’s camp. We apply our criteria by examining terrorists’ (sincere and insincere) apologies. 
650 4 |a Propaganda 
650 4 |a Rhetoric 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a Image 
650 4 |a Apology 
700 1 |a Reichard, Ariel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Terrorism and political violence  |d London : Cass, 1989  |g 31(2019), 4, Seite 759-778  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349234795  |w (DE-600)2080322-9  |w (DE-576)113563507  |x 1556-1836  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:759-778 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2017.1283308  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2017.1283308  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325224289 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846232449 
LOK |0 005 20230525153742 
LOK |0 008 230525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw