Unexpected questions in deception detection interviews: does question order matter?

Purpose. Unexpected questions have been shown to increase cues to deception, without reducing the information given by truth tellers. Two studies investigated whether the detail given by an interviewee is affected by whether the expected or unexpected questions are asked first. Methods. In Study 1,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Warmelink, Lara (Autor)
Otros Autores: Subramanian, Anna ; Tkacheva, Daria ; McLatchie, Neil
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2019, Volumen: 24, Número: 2, Páginas: 258-272
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1846213193
003 DE-627
005 20230531143011.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230525s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12151  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846213193 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846213193 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Warmelink, Lara  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Unexpected questions in deception detection interviews  |b does question order matter?  |c Lara Warmelink, Anna Subramanian, Daria Tkacheva and Neil McLatchie 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 270-272 
500 |a Gesehen am 25.05.2023 
500 |a First published: 05 April 2019 
520 |a Purpose. Unexpected questions have been shown to increase cues to deception, without reducing the information given by truth tellers. Two studies investigated whether the detail given by an interviewee is affected by whether the expected or unexpected questions are asked first. Methods. In Study 1, participants (N = 85) were interviewed about their own intentions, and in Study 2, participants (N = 84) were given an intention by the experimenter. They were then interviewed. Results. Results showed that in both studies, differences between the expected-first and the unexpected-first order were minimal and lie detection accuracy was not improved by asking the unexpected questions first. Conclusions. These results offer important information for forensic interviewers, showing that there is no need to ask unexpected questions at a certain point in the interview. Link to associated OSF page: https://osf.io/93g7h/?view_only=586daff060d846efb760c8155478ce9e. 
650 4 |a Deception 
650 4 |a Interviews 
700 1 |a Subramanian, Anna  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tkacheva, Daria  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McLatchie, Neil  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 24(2019), 2, Seite 258-272  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:258-272 
856 |u https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/132533/2/RvsI_order_effects_manuscript_lcp_resubmission_2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12151  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12151  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325222391 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846213193 
LOK |0 005 20230616152652 
LOK |0 008 230525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw