Death penalty decision-making: Fundamentalist beliefs and the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances

Purpose. Jurors’ religious characteristics are related to death penalty attitudes and verdicts. Jurors’ religious characteristics might also relate to endorsements of aggravating circumstances (aggravators) and mitigating circumstances (mitigators)—factors that make a defendant more or less deservin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Yelderman, Logan A. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: West, Matthew P. ; Miller, Monica K.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2019
In: Legal and criminological psychology
Jahr: 2019, Band: 24, Heft: 1, Seiten: 103-122
Online-Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1846192765
003 DE-627
005 20230531144024.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230525s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12141  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846192765 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846192765 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Yelderman, Logan A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Death penalty decision-making  |b Fundamentalist beliefs and the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances  |c Logan A. Yelderman, Matthew P. West and Monica K. Miller 
264 1 |c 2019 
300 |b Diagramme 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 119-122 
500 |a Gesehen am 25.05.2023 
500 |a First published: 04 September 2018 
520 |a Purpose. Jurors’ religious characteristics are related to death penalty attitudes and verdicts. Jurors’ religious characteristics might also relate to endorsements of aggravating circumstances (aggravators) and mitigating circumstances (mitigators)—factors that make a defendant more or less deserving of the death penalty, respectively. The purpose of this research was to assess the extent to which religious fundamentalism was related to endorsement and weighing of aggravators and mitigators and subsequent death penalty decisions while controlling for relevant religious and demographic characteristics. Methods. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 included a regression analysis in which participants filled out religious and demographic measures via an online survey. In Study 2, participants acted as mock jurors in a death penalty trial in which the defendant was already found guilty. Mock jurors read the case facts and attorney arguments and then weighed aggravators and mitigators before recommending a sentence for the defendant. Results. In Study 1, fundamentalism negatively predicted mitigator endorsement, intrinsic religiosity negatively predicted aggravator endorsement, and orthodoxy positively predicted aggravator endorsement. In Study 2, fundamentalism was related to death penalty sentences, and this was mediated by people's weighing of aggravators and mitigators. Specifically, fundamentalism was related to a lower likelihood of choosing a life sentence because fundamentalism was negatively related to weighing mitigators over aggravators. Conclusions. Results support and explain prior research linking fundamentalism with punitiveness in death penalty cases. Such findings support the “eye for an eye” punishment philosophy associated with fundamentalist beliefs. Theoretical and legal implications are discussed. 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Fundamentalism 
650 4 |a Death Penalty 
650 4 |a aggravating and mitigating circumstances 
650 4 |a Attitudes 
700 1 |a West, Matthew P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Miller, Monica K.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052131204  |0 (DE-627)787866962  |0 (DE-576)188717943  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 24(2019), 1, Seite 103-122  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g pages:103-122 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/lcrp.12141  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free article)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12141  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12141  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325128697 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846192765 
LOK |0 005 20230616152750 
LOK |0 008 230525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw