Choose your weapon: the impact of strategic considerations and resource constraints on terrorist group weapon selection

Historians of terrorism note that modern terrorists rely almost exclusively on two weapon types: the gun and the bomb. However, the comparative use of these weapons differs from one terrorist group to the next. We exploit this variation to examine how the tactical decisions of terrorists respond to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Koehler-Derrick, Gabriel (Autor)
Otros Autores: Milton, Daniel James
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Terrorism and political violence
Año: 2019, Volumen: 31, Número: 5, Páginas: 909-928
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1846130212
003 DE-627
005 20230524145306.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230524s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09546553.2017.1293533  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846130212 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846130212 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Koehler-Derrick, Gabriel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Choose your weapon: the impact of strategic considerations and resource constraints on terrorist group weapon selection  |c Gabriel Koehler-Derrick and Daniel James Milton 
264 1 |c 2019 
300 |b Illustrationen 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 24.05.2023 
500 |a Published online: 09 Mar 2017 
520 |a Historians of terrorism note that modern terrorists rely almost exclusively on two weapon types: the gun and the bomb. However, the comparative use of these weapons differs from one terrorist group to the next. We exploit this variation to examine how the tactical decisions of terrorists respond to both strategic aspirations and resource constraints. We argue that a group’s goals (a strategic consideration) and size (a resource constraint) provide a parsimonious explanation for weapon selection. Because firearms inherently expose the shooter to higher risk, are more precise, and must be used if a group aspires to maintain social order, they are unlikely to be used by groups with limited recruits in a campaign of violence. We test this theory using data on over 350 terrorist organizations. Our analysis shows that strategic considerations and resource constraints both impact tactical choices, although groups with the most expansive goals, those which transcend national borders, as well as militias, are two interesting exceptions to our theory. Our research has implications for the use of disaggregated tactical data and in furthering our understanding of the rationality of terrorism. 
650 4 |a Terrorism 
650 4 |a Terrorist 
650 4 |a Groups 
650 4 |a weapon selection 
700 1 |a Milton, Daniel James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Terrorism and political violence  |d London : Cass, 1989  |g 31(2019), 5, Seite 909-928  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349234795  |w (DE-600)2080322-9  |w (DE-576)113563507  |x 1556-1836  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2019  |g number:5  |g pages:909-928 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2017.1293533  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2017.1293533  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325060553 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846130212 
LOK |0 005 20230524145306 
LOK |0 008 230524||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw