‘Do no harm’?: Exploring the scope of economic and social rights in transitional justice

Increasing numbers of academics and practitioners are employing the language of economic and social rights (ESR) when conceptualizing the aims, scope and implementation mechanisms of transitional justice. Their contributions have added to an evolving debate on the boundaries of transitional justice....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Schmid, Evelyne (Author) ; Nolan, Aoife (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
In: International journal of transitional justice
Year: 2014, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 362-382
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1843433249
003 DE-627
005 20231006082250.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230424s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/ijtj/iju015  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1843433249 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1843433249 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schmid, Evelyne  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1071906941  |0 (DE-627)826598986  |0 (DE-576)433420332  |4 aut 
109 |a Schmid, Evelyne 
245 1 0 |a ‘Do no harm’?  |b Exploring the scope of economic and social rights in transitional justice  |c Evelyne Schmid, Aoife Nolan 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Increasing numbers of academics and practitioners are employing the language of economic and social rights (ESR) when conceptualizing the aims, scope and implementation mechanisms of transitional justice. Their contributions have added to an evolving debate on the boundaries of transitional justice. However, when employing rights language, the current debate on the economic and social dimensions of transitional justice frequently suffers from terminological and conceptual confusion. Problematically, it is not unusual for the claims made by transitional justice commentators with regard to ESR to be founded on apparent misconceptions about both the legal framework and the existing scholarship relating to ESR. Addressing these misconceptions in terms of four key dichotomies and suggesting the way forward, we prepare the ground for a more effective debate on the desirability and feasibility of incorporating ESR into transitional justice processes. In doing so, we assert that such a debate must be based on an accurate understanding of ESR and the obligations they impose. We conclude by demonstrating how inclusion of ESR considerations in transitional justice does not necessitate rethinking transitional justice as a whole. 
650 4 |a Human Rights 
650 4 |a Economic and social rights 
650 4 |a Structural Violence 
700 1 |a Nolan, Aoife  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1017341850  |0 (DE-627)69031499X  |0 (DE-576)322976952  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of transitional justice  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007  |g 8(2014), 3, Seite 362-382  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)525091637  |w (DE-600)2271878-3  |w (DE-576)278543480  |x 1752-7724  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:362-382 
856 |u https://academic.oup.com/ijtj/article-pdf/8/3/362/9533286/iju015.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/ijtj/article/8/3/362/2912086  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju015  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4312963339 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1843433249 
LOK |0 005 20240410115025 
LOK |0 008 230424||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw