Negotiating penal hybridity: Time–space boundary-work in parole decision making

Drawn on qualitative findings from discretionary chairpersons of parole boards in Israel, the study aims to theorize parole decision making as time–space boundary-work. Parole decision-makers were found to act within a hybrid professional environment that requires them to process distinct, and possi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dagan, Netanel (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2023
En: Theoretical criminology
Año: 2023, Volumen: 27, Número: 2, Páginas: 204-223
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1842985744
003 DE-627
005 20230418043610.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230418s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/13624806221093088  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1842985744 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1842985744 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dagan, Netanel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Dagan, Netanel 
245 1 0 |a Negotiating penal hybridity: Time–space boundary-work in parole decision making 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Drawn on qualitative findings from discretionary chairpersons of parole boards in Israel, the study aims to theorize parole decision making as time–space boundary-work. Parole decision-makers were found to act within a hybrid professional environment that requires them to process distinct, and possibly conflicting, penal values, competencies and orientations. In order to address their professional tensions, parole decision-makers constantly negotiate their time and space, and thereby their professional identity. First, the parole decision-makers perform temporal boundary-work—conceptualizing their work and identity through qualitative-expansive time. Second, they perform spatial boundary-work—conceptualizing their work and identity through either (a) judicial space or (b) therapeutic space. This time–space work is used both to span and demarcate their boundaries in relation to other penal actors and to increase their visibility and legitimacy. 
650 4 |a time–space work 
650 4 |a Professional Identity 
650 4 |a Parole 
650 4 |a Decision Making 
650 4 |a Boundary-work 
650 4 |a boundary-spanning 
650 4 |a boundary-making 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theoretical criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1997  |g 27(2023), 2, Seite 204-223  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320645681  |w (DE-600)2025383-7  |w (DE-576)098253387  |x 1461-7439  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g pages:204-223 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13624806221093088  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221093088  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4310650570 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1842985744 
LOK |0 005 20230418043610 
LOK |0 008 230418||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-04-16#CFFD71CB9FCD5B35C4BF5AE7E3E6FCF6AECBC827 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw