Free Press, Fair Trial Data, 1970

This data collection contains information gathered in a 1970 survey of 623 newspaper editors, police chiefs, bar associations, prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166 cities across the country. The study's research objectives were to develop a model for determining the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nagel, Stuart S. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Eimermann, Thomas (Contribuidor) ; Reinbolt, Kathleen (Contribuidor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Research Data
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 1984
En:Año: 1984
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840068957
003 DE-627
005 20230325055334.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR07541.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840068957 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840068957 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Nagel, Stuart S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Free Press, Fair Trial Data, 1970 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 1984 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This data collection contains information gathered in a 1970 survey of 623 newspaper editors, police chiefs, bar associations, prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166 cities across the country. The study's research objectives were to develop a model for determining the optimum mix of free press and fair trial in pending criminal cases, to compare alternative procedures for handling the free press/fair trial problem, and to compare the attitudes and procedures of the various decisionmakers involved. Information gathered in the survey includes: (1) the degree of pretrial press publicity allowed on pending criminal cases, (2) relevant attitudes and opinions, especially concerning ways of reducing the adverse effects of pretrial publicity while still having an informed public (e.g., the degree to which the public needs to know the details of criminal proceedings, whether the traditional legal remedies of change of venue, voir dire, sequestering, etc., are adequate to neutralize the effects of possibly prejudicial news coverage, and whether the American Bar Association's restrictions on the extent of information lawyers can release represents an infringement upon the people's right to know), (3) the benefits seen as derived from news coverage of criminal cases, and (4) prevailing pretrial procedures by editors, police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. Demographic data (e.g., population, region, and whether an SMSA or not) about the 106 cities represented in the survey are also included in the file. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a United States 
650 4 |a Attitudes 
650 4 |a attorneys 
650 4 |a Criminal Justice Policy 
650 4 |a fair trial-free press 
650 4 |a Freedom of information 
650 4 |a Freedom of the press 
650 4 |a Media coverage 
650 4 |a News Media 
650 4 |a opinions 
650 4 |a pretrial procedures 
650 4 |a pretrial publicity 
650 4 |a trial procedures 
650 4 |a Trials 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
700 1 |a Eimermann, Thomas  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
700 1 |a Reinbolt, Kathleen  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07541.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296816837 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840068957 
LOK |0 005 20230324125346 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR7541 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw