|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1840068736 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250706102822.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1840068736
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1840068736
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Marvell, Thomas
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a State Appellate Court Adaptation to Caseload Increase, 1968-1984: (United States)
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 1988
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This data collection examines the impact of caseload pressures on both intermediate appellate courts and supreme courts for each state in the nation. The data describe in detail the changes made by appellate courts and supply information related to each change. These changes include (1) adding judges, law clerks and staff attorneys, (2) expanding or creating intermediate appellate courts, (3) reducing panel size, (4) using summary procedures, (5) curtailing opinion practices by deciding cases without opinion or unpublished and memo opinions, and (6) curtailing oral argument length.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a court system
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a CRIMINAL justice system
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a judicial process
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Moody, Carlisle
|e MitwirkendeR
|4 ctb
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Moody, Carlisle E.
|t Appellate and trial court caseload growth: A pooled time-series-cross-section analysis
|d 1987
|w (DE-627)1912458616
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas
|t Appellate Court Responses to Caseload Growth
|d United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1986
|w (DE-627)1912458624
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t The effectiveness of measures to increase appellate court efficiency and decision output
|d 1988
|w (DE-627)1912527677
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t Growth in state judgeships, 1970-1984: What factors are important?
|d 1985
|w (DE-627)1912569388
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t The Impact of Intermediate Courts
|d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1986
|w (DE-627)1912583232
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t State Appellate Court Adaptation to Caseload and Delay Problems
|d United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1985
|w (DE-627)1912710935
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t State Appellate Court Adaptation to Caseload Growth, Final Report
|d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1986
|w (DE-627)1912710943
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Marvell, Thomas B.
|t State appellate court responses to caseload growth
|d 1989
|w (DE-627)1912710951
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08262.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|7 0
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296816608
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1840068736
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125345
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR8262
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 939
|a 24-03-23
|b l01
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
