Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: (United States)

This multi-site data collection evaluates the impact of judicial adjunct attorneys and referees on the court system at the county and state levels in six jurisdictions: (1) Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County, Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4) Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix, A...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aikman, Alexander (Author)
Contributors: Elsner Oram, Mary (Contributor) ; Miller, Frederick (Contributor)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 1989
In:Year: 1989
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840062568
003 DE-627
005 20230325055248.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s1989 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR08979.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840062568 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840062568 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Aikman, Alexander  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Use of Adjuncts to Supplement Judicial Resources in Six Jurisdictions, 1983-1986: (United States) 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 1989 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This multi-site data collection evaluates the impact of judicial adjunct attorneys and referees on the court system at the county and state levels in six jurisdictions: (1) Pima County, Arizona, (2) Multnomah County, Oregon, (3) King County, Washington, (4) Hennepin County, Minnesota, (5) Phoenix, Arizona, and (6) the state of Connecticut. There are three different units of observation in this study: (1) civil trial cases, (2) trial judges, including regular judges and adjunct attorneys, and (3) litigating attorneys. The court case data include information on type of case, date of trial, type of judge, type of disposition, and date of disposition. For the questionnaire data obtained on judges, adjuncts, and litigating attorneys, information includes experience with the program, satisfaction, and ideas for changes. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a attorneys 
650 4 |a court cases 
650 4 |a disposition (legal) 
650 4 |a Judges 
650 4 |a judicial process 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
700 1 |a Elsner Oram, Mary  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
700 1 |a Miller, Frederick  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08979.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296810219 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840062568 
LOK |0 005 20230324125316 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR8979 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw