United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, Phase II: 1953-1993

The purpose of this data collection was to record information about the cases, litigants, amicus participants, and the opinions decided by the Supreme Court under the tenure of Chief Justices Earl Warren (1953-1969) and Warren Burger (1969-1986) and others through 1993. The approach of this study wa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gibson, James L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 1997
In:Year: 1997
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840060921
003 DE-627
005 20250708095552.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR06987.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840060921 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840060921 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gibson, James L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, Phase II: 1953-1993 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 1997 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The purpose of this data collection was to record information about the cases, litigants, amicus participants, and the opinions decided by the Supreme Court under the tenure of Chief Justices Earl Warren (1953-1969) and Warren Burger (1969-1986) and others through 1993. The approach of this study was to proceed deductively, rather than seek to infer values of a particular group of justices. This method allows the investigation of value conflicts that are not litigated, as well as the value conflicts represented in Supreme Court opinions. Opinions are coded on the basis of their literal content, and the data are organized around the opinions. There are eight types of opinions. Within each type, up to six topics are coded, and within each topic, up to two values are coded. There are three integrated parts to this study, each of which can be linked to the other files by specific variables. Part 1, Supreme Court Database, contains basic case attributes from UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL DATABASE, 1953-1993 TERMS (ICPSR 9422) and the opinions given in the cases. Part 2, Briefs, gives information on the filers and co-filers for cases in which amicus curie briefs were filed. Part 3, Groups, lists the litigants' names. The distinct aspects of the Court's decisions are covered by six types of variables in Part 1: (1) identification variables including case citation, docket number, unit of analysis, and number of records per unit of analysis, (2) background variables offering information on origin of case, source of case, reason for granting cert, parties to the case, direction of the lower court's decision, and manner in which the Court takes jurisdiction, (3) chronological variables covering date of term of court, chief justice, and natural court, (4) substantive variables including multiple legal provisions, authority for decision, issue, issue areas, and direction of decision, (5) outcome variables supplying information on form of decision, disposition of case, winning party, declaration of unconstitutionality, and multiple memorandum decisions, and (6) voting and opinion variables pertaining to the vote in the case and to the direction of the individual justices' votes. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a Supreme Court decisions 
650 4 |a Supreme Court justices 
650 4 |a United States Supreme Court 
650 4 |a Case processing 
650 4 |a court cases 
650 4 |a disposition (legal) 
650 4 |a judicial decisions 
650 4 |a judicial review 
650 4 |a Legal History 
650 4 |a Twentieth Century 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Roberts, Matthew M.C.  |t The Amicus Curiae at Oral Argument: New Evidence of How and Why Third Parties Shape Supreme Court Decisions  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : University of Minnesota, 2009  |w (DE-627)1912456222 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Pacelle, Richard L., 1954 -   |t Amicus curiae or amicus praesidentis - Reexamining the role of the solicitor general in filing amici  |d 2006  |w (DE-627)1912456249 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa A., 1970 -   |t Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : University of Virginia Press, 2007  |w (DE-627)1912458055 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Maltzman, Forrest, 1963 -   |t A conditional model of opinion assignment on the Supreme Court  |d 2004  |w (DE-627)1912489384 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Harvey, Anna, 1966 -   |t Confirmation bias in the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database  |d Midwestern Political Science Association, 2009  |w (DE-627)1912489619 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Harvey, Anna, 1966 -   |t Confirmation bias in the United States Supreme Court Judicial Database  |d 2013  |w (DE-627)1912489627 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t Congressional preferences, perceptions of threat, and Supreme Court decision making  |d 2000  |w (DE-627)1912489783 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Bailey, Michael A., 1969 -   |t The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : Princeton University Press, 2011  |w (DE-627)1912490633 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa  |t The Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court  |d University of Southern California Law School, 2005  |w (DE-627)1912516357 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Epstein, Lee, 1958 -   |t Dynamic agenda-setting on the United States Supreme Court: An empirical analysis  |d 2002  |w (DE-627)1912524759 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas  |t The dynamics of interest representation at the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2011  |w (DE-627)1912524988 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa A., 1970 -   |t The effect of politically salient decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court's agenda  |d 2004  |w (DE-627)1912529424 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Carrubba, Clifford  |t Executive Discretion, Judicial Decision Making, and Separation of Powers in the United States  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2008  |w (DE-627)1912548534 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Carrubba, Clifford J.  |t Executive discretion, judicial decision making, and separation of powers in the United States  |d 2010  |w (DE-627)1912548542 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Collins, Paul M.  |t Friends of the court: Examining the influence of amicus curiae participation in U.S. Supreme Court litigation  |d 2004  |w (DE-627)1912562464 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Kim, Minjeong  |t Friends of the First Amendment? Amicus curiae briefs in free speech/press cases during the Warren and Burger Courts  |d 2009  |w (DE-627)1912562480 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Collins, Paul M.  |t Friends of the Supreme Court: Examining the Influence of Interest Groups in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1946-2001  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : State University of New York, 2005  |w (DE-627)1912562499 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa, 1963 -   |t How the dissent becomes the majority: Using federalism to transform coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2009  |w (DE-627)1912577038 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hazelton, Morgan L.W.  |t The influence of unique information in briefs on Supreme Court opinion content  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1912591383 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Brenner, Saul, 1930 -   |t 'In my opinion...': Justices' opinion writing in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1946-1997  |d 2002  |w (DE-627)1912592770 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Almeida, Richard  |t Interest Group Coalitions and the Spatial Theory of Choice: A Spatial Model of Group Participation on Amicus Curiae Briefs  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : University of Missouri, 2006  |w (DE-627)1912594498 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa, 1963 -   |t Judicial agenda setting through signaling and strategic litigant responses  |d 2009  |w (DE-627)1912601397 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Richards, Mark  |t Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making  |d 2002  |w (DE-627)1912601842 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t The legal advocacy network  |d American Political Science Association, 2010  |w (DE-627)1912607808 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t Lobbying strategies, venue selection, and organized interest involvement at the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2004  |w (DE-627)1912610728 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Rice, Douglas, 1983 -   |t Measuring the issue content of Supreme Court opinions  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1912618931 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t The nature and timing of the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of precedent  |d Midwest Political Science Association, 2002  |w (DE-627)1912632780 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Fowler, James H., 1970 -   |t Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of Supreme Court precedents  |d 2007  |w (DE-627)1912635240 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hendrickson, Scott  |t Opposite Side of the Same Agenda Setting Coin? DIGs in the U.S. Supreme Court  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012  |w (DE-627)1912641984 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t Organized Interest Lobbying Strategies and the Decision to Participate at the U.S. Supreme Court as Amicus Curiae  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : University of California, 2001  |w (DE-627)1912642719 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Baird, Vanessa A., 1970 -   |t Pathways of Judicial Power: The Symbiotic Relationship Between Policy Entrepreneurs and the United States Supreme Court  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : University of Houston, 2000  |w (DE-627)1912646129 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Wahlbeck, Paul J., 1961 -   |t The politics of dissents and concurrences on the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 1999  |w (DE-627)1912655691 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : Princeton University Press, 2006  |w (DE-627)1912655780 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Caporale, Tony  |t A positive political model of Supreme Court economic decisions  |d 2002  |w (DE-627)1912656531 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Gibson, James L.  |t Public Reverence for the United States Supreme Court: Is the Court Invincible?  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2012  |w (DE-627)1912670615 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Li, Siyu  |t A separation-of-powers model of U.S. Chief Justice opinion assignment  |d 2020  |w (DE-627)191269980X 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Foote, Paul D.  |t Sixty years after Brown v. Board of Education: The role that moderate justices' played on the Warren court in closely divided and salient cases  |d 2015  |w (DE-627)1912704323 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Canelo, Kayla S.  |t State coalitions, informational signals, and success as amicus curiae at the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2020  |w (DE-627)191271096X 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Nicholson-Crotty, Sean  |t State merit amicus participation and federalism outcomes in the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2007  |w (DE-627)1912711974 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Krewson, Christopher N.  |t Strategic sensationalism: Why justices use emotional appeals in Supreme Court opinions  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1912713551 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Arrington, Theodore S.  |t Strategic voting for damage control on the Supreme Court  |d 2004  |w (DE-627)1912713578 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t The supply of amicus curiae briefs in the market for information at the U.S. Supreme Court  |d 2014  |w (DE-627)1912718561 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Epstein, Lee, 1958 -   |t The Supreme Court as a strategic national policymaker  |d 2001  |w (DE-627)1912718855 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Wedeking, Justin  |t Supreme Court litigants and strategic framing  |d 2010  |w (DE-627)1912718952 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Johnson, Timothy R.  |t The Supreme Court, the solicitor general, and the separation of powers  |d 2003  |w (DE-627)1912718995 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Wohlfarth, Patrick C.  |t The tenth justice? Consequences of politicization in the solicitor general's office  |d 2009  |w (DE-627)1912722348 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hendrickson, Scott A.  |t To DIG or not to DIG: Using DIGs to examine Supreme Court decision making and agenda setting  |d American Political Science Association, 2003  |w (DE-627)1912725800 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten zu  |a Hansford, Thomas G., 1971 -   |t Using the amici network to measure the ex ante ideological loading of Supreme Court cases  |d Midwest Political Science Association, 2012  |w (DE-627)1912738341 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06987.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296808567 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840060921 
LOK |0 005 20230324125307 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR6987 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
LOK |0 939   |a 24-03-23  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw