|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
184005994X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250629212743.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR02891.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)184005994X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP184005994X
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Collins, James J.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluation of North Carolina's 1994 Structured Sentencing Law, 1992-1998
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2001
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Effective October 1, 1994, the state of North Carolina implemented a new structured sentencing law that applied to all felony and misdemeanor crimes (except for driving while impaired) committed on or after October 1, 1994. Under the new structured sentencing law parole was eliminated, and a sentencing commission developed recommended ranges of punishment for offense and offender categories, set priorities for the use of correctional resources, and developed a model to estimate correctional populations. This study sought to investigate sentencing reforms by looking at the effects of structured sentencing on multiple aspects of the adjudication process in North Carolina. A further objective was to determine whether there were differences in the commission of institutional infractions between inmates sentenced to North Carolina prisons under the pre-structured versus structured sentencing laws. Researchers hoped that the results of this study may help North Carolina and jurisdictions around the country (1) anticipate the likely effects of structured sentencing laws, (2) design new laws that might better achieve the jurisdictions' goals, and (3) improve the potential of sentencing legislation in order to enhance public safety in an effective and equitable way. Administrative records data were collected from two sources. First, in order to examine the effects of structured sentencing on the adjudication process in North Carolina, criminal case data were obtained from the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts (Parts 1 and 2). The pre-structured sentencing and structured sentencing samples were selected at the case level, and each record in Parts 1 and 2 represents a charged offense processed in either the North Carolina Superior or District Court. Second, inmate records data were collected from administrative records provided by the North Carolina Department of Correction (Part 3). These data were used to compare the involvement in infractions of inmates sentenced under both pre-structured and structured sentencing. The data for Part 3 focused on inmates entering the prison system between June 1, 1995, and January 31, 1998. Variables for Parts 1 and 2 include type of charge, charged offense date, method of disposition (e.g., dismissal, withdrawal, jury trial), defendant's plea, verdict for the offense, and whether the offense was processed through the North Carolina Superior or District Court. Structured sentencing offense class and modified Uniform Crime Reporting code for both charged and convicted offenses are presented for Parts 1 and 2. There are also county, prosecutorial district, and defendant episode identifiers in both parts. Variables related to defendant episodes include types of offenses within episode, total number of charges and convictions, whether all charges were dismissed, whether any felony charge resulted in a jury trial, and the adjudication time for all charges. Demographic variables for Parts 1 and 2 include the defendant's age, race, and gender. Part 3 variables include the date of prison admission, sentence type, number of prior incarcerations, number of years served during prior incarcerations, maximum sentence length for current incarceration, jail credit in years, count of all infractions during current and prior incarcerations, reason for incarceration, infraction rate, the risk for alcohol and drug dependency based on alcohol and chemical dependency screening scores, and the number of assault, drug/alcohol, profanity/disobedience, work absence, and money/property infractions during an inmate's current incarceration. Demographic variables for Part 3 include race, gender, and age at the time of each inmate's prison admission.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a CRIMINAL justice system
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a felony offenses
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a misdemeanor offenses
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a policies and procedures
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Punishment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Sentencing
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a sentencing reforms
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Spencer, Donna L.
|e MitwirkendeR
|4 ctb
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Collins, James J.
|t Evaluation of North Carolina's Structured Sentencing Law
|d United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1999
|w (DE-627)1912543591
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Collins, James J.
|t Evaluation of North Carolina's Structured Sentencing Law
|d United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 1999
|w (DE-627)1912543605
|
| 787 |
0 |
8 |
|i Forschungsdaten zu
|a Li, De-Ming
|t Mental status of the oldest-old in China and its related factors
|d 2007
|w (DE-627)1912621290
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02891.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|7 0
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296807587
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 184005994X
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125303
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR2891
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 939
|a 24-03-23
|b l01
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
