|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002 4500 |
| 001 |
184005655X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20230325055202.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)184005655X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP184005655X
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Latzer, Barry
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Multistate Analysis of Time Consumption in Capital Appeals, 1992-2002
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2008
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Despite public controversy over the length of death penalty appeals, little empirical work has been done on the time allocated to the capital appeals process. The purpose of this study was to perform a multistate empirical analysis of the time expended in direct appeals of capital cases. The researchers included decisions from 14 states that they believed to be representative of the 37 states that have enforceable death penalty laws. For each of the 14 states included in the study, the researchers examined every capital case decided on direct appeal by the courts of last resort between the dates January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2002. The researchers developed a case database by examining a variety of sources. For each of the 1,676 cases in the multistate database, the research team collected time consumption data for each of the following five phases of the direct appeal process: (1) the postsentence stage, (2) the preparation stage, (3) the argument stage, (4) the decision stage, and (5) the supreme court stage. Variables include state, case characteristics, court opinion variables, dates, and time consumption variables.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Supreme Court decisions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a United States Supreme Court
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a appeal procedures
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a appellate courts
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Capital Punishment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Case processing
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a certiorari
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a death row inmates
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a disposition (legal)
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Executions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a judicial decisions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a murderers
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a sentence review
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Sentencing
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a state supreme courts
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Cauthen, James N.G.
|e MitwirkendeR
|4 ctb
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21680.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296804162
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 184005655X
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125246
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR21680
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
