|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1840054905 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20230325055150.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR04686.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1840054905
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1840054905
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Mears, Daniel P.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluation of the Agriculture Crime Technology Information and Operation Network (ACTION) in Nine Counties in California, 2004-2005
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2009
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The Urban Institute and Florida State University multidisciplinary research team employed a multimethod approach to evaluate the Agricultural Crime, Technology, Information, and Operations Network (ACTION) project. The goal of the research was to provide policymakers, practitioners, program developers, and funders with empirically-based information about whether ACTION works. Two paper-and-pencil, self-administered surveys -- one in fall 2004 and the second in fall 2005 -- were sent to samples of farmers in the nine ACTION counties in California. The researchers identified farms using lists provided by Agricultural Commissioners in each county. The survey instruments asked farmers about experiences with agricultural crime victimization during the 12 months prior to the survey. It also asked questions about characteristics of their farm operations and the activities that they take to prevent agricultural crime. Advance notice of the study was given to farmers through the use of postcards, then surveys were sent to farmers in three waves at one-month intervals, with the second and third waves targeting nonrespondents. The Fall 2004 Agricultural Crime Survey (Part 1) contains data on 823 respondents (farms) and the Fall 2005 Agricultural Crime Survey (Part 2) contains data on 818 respondents (farms).
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a agricultural census
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a agricultural policy
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Agriculture
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Burglary
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime Control
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a crime control programs
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a crime costs
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime Prevention
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime Reduction
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime reporting
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Farmers
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a farming communities
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a farms
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Larceny
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Law Enforcement
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Security
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a security systems
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Surveillance
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a surveillance equipment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Victimization
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Rossman, Shelli B.
|e MitwirkendeR
|4 ctb
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04686.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296802488
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1840054905
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125238
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR4686
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
