RT Research Data
T1 Research on Pathways to Desistance (Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA): Calendar Data, 2000-2010 (Restricted)
A1 Mulvey, Edward P.
LA English
PP Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar
PB [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
YR 2014
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1840043180
AB The Calendar data files are comprised of 47 total parts spread across 13 distinct topical domains. <ul> <li>Academic Achievement</li> <li>Antisocial Activity</li> <li>Community-Based Services</li> <li>Contact With the Justice System</li> <li>Court Monitoring</li> <li>Gainful Activity</li> <li>Head Injury</li> <li>Living Situation</li> <li>Making and Spending Money</li> <li>Medication</li> <li>Out of Community Placement</li> <li>Romance</li> <li>School</li> </ul>Each topical domain contains multiple reference periods for looking at the topic across the entire data collection period of the study. Users who request these restricted data should first review the documentation available from NAHDAP (user guide and frequency codebooks) and from the Pathways Website <a href="http://www.pathwaysstudy.pitt.edu/codebook/calendars.html">(domain content codebooks)</a>. This review will help determine which specific datasets will be needed for your project. The "Research Description" in ICPSR's Data Access Request System (IDARS) must include a specific explanation of why you need each topic domain selected on the "Data Selection" page in IDARS. Most projects should only require one reference period per topic domain being requested. Data requests for all reference periods within a given domain will not be approved without a satisfactory explanation of why all of the reference periods are required for your project. Since the Calendar data collection is very extensive and Restricted Data Use Agreements are only for 2 years, data requests are not expected to need the entire Calendar data collection. The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
K1 Academic Achievement
K1 community involvement
K1 Crime
K1 demographic characteristics
K1 Employment
K1 Family Life
K1 friendships
K1 household composition
K1 Income
K1 Injuries
K1 Interpersonal Relations
K1 Juvenile Crime
K1 Juvenile Offenders
K1 medications
K1 personal adjustment
K1 psychological evaluation
K1 psychosocial assessment
K1 Religion
K1 Service providers
K1 Social Behavior
K1 Substance Abuse
K1 Forschungsdaten
DO 10.3886/ICPSR32282.v3