The Impact of a Forensic Collaborative for Older Adults on Criminal Justice and Victim Outcomes: A Randomized-Control, Longitudinal Design, Denver, Colorado, 2014-2018

Initially funded in 2013 by the National Institute of Justice, the primary purpose of this project was to conduct a randomized-control test of the impact of a victim-focused, forensic collaborative relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victims' health, mental health, and criminal justice o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DePrince, Anne P. (Author)
Contributors: Hasche, Leslie (Contributor)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 2020
In:Year: 2020
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840039051
003 DE-627
005 20230325054951.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR37167.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840039051 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840039051 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a DePrince, Anne P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a DePrince, Anne P.  |a Prince, Anne P. de 
245 1 4 |a The Impact of a Forensic Collaborative for Older Adults on Criminal Justice and Victim Outcomes: A Randomized-Control, Longitudinal Design, Denver, Colorado, 2014-2018 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Initially funded in 2013 by the National Institute of Justice, the primary purpose of this project was to conduct a randomized-control test of the impact of a victim-focused, forensic collaborative relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victims' health, mental health, and criminal justice outcomes. During the course of the project, researchers responded to enrollment and consent challenges by implementing Arm 2 that focused on collecting caseworker and victim advocate perceptions of cases as well as administrative data from Adult Protective Services (APS). This collection contains 6 datasets: <ul> <li>Arm 1 (DS1) contains survey results from victim-focused interviews of 40 older adults who were reported to be victims of abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation over 4 time points. Variables describe victim and case characteristics, service use/needs, risk factors for abuse, consequences of abuse and exploitation, and criminal justice process and outcomes.</li> <li>Arm 2 (DS2) includes a survey of APS caseworkers reporting on a case of older adult abuse, such as client (older adult victim) and perpetrator demographics, mistreatment details (verbal abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, and/or housing exploitation), and service use.</li> <li>Collateral assessments (DS3) surveyed a trusted individual related to the older adult respondent in Arm 1. This included data on the perceptions of the older adult's functioning and use of services; and the quality of decision-making procedures, desired treatment, and outcomes in the criminal justice system. Of the 40 Arm 1 participants interviewed, 33 gave collateral contact information. Of those 33, 16 could not be reached, one failed the consent quiz, and two declined to participate. Of the 14 who participated in an initial interview, only three participated at the follow-up nine months later.</li> <li>Revictimization and Prosecutorial Outcome Data (DS5) includes information on new incidents reported to law enforcement over the nine months following the original incident report and prosecution outcomes, gathered from publicly-accessible police reports and court information for Arm 1 and Arm 2 cases.</li> <li>APS administrative data (DS6), such as the demographics of the older adult victim and the primary perpetrator, assessment scores for risk and safety, the alleged mistreatment type, whether mistreatment was substantiated, and APS case status. The data included overall risk/safety scores and summary scores for the domains of physical functioning, environmental context, financial resources, mental health, cognition, medical issues, and mistreatment.</li> </ul> Arm 1 demographic variables includes age, gender, education, employment status, marital status, household size, ethnic minority, and income source. Arm 2 surveys reported ethnicity, gender, age, education, marital status, and employment status; APS data reported age and gender. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a CRIMINAL justice system 
650 4 |a Elder Abuse 
650 4 |a Exploitation 
650 4 |a Mental Health 
650 4 |a Older Adults 
650 4 |a Post-traumatic stress disorder 
650 4 |a Victimization 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
700 1 |a Hasche, Leslie  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37167.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 429678630X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840039051 
LOK |0 005 20230324125121 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR37167 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw