|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
184003890X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20230325054950.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR37172.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)184003890X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP184003890X
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Jalbert, Sarah
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluating the Impact of Probation and Parole Home Visits, United States, 2016 and 2018
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2020
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In 2014, the researchers began work on a grant from the National Institute of Justice to evaluate the effectiveness of home and field contacts in community supervision. The study was designed to describe the varying practices of home and other field contacts in community supervision, to document their use nationwide, and to evaluate their effectiveness in maintaining public safety and promoting compliance with supervision requirements. The research is designed to address the gap in the understanding of home and field contacts as part of community supervision. While home and field contacts with clients are common practice within many probation and parole agencies, little is known about how they are conducted, the goals of their use, and whether they impact client outcomes. Researchers conducted a mixed methods study of home and field contact practices within multiple agencies. A nationwide survey of community supervision agencies at the federal, state, and local levels was conducted to understand common policies and practices for home and field contacts. To analyze the effectiveness of home and field contacts, quasi-experimental designs were employed using administrative data. To understand the activities that make up home and field contacts and the goals behind them within each agency, officers were asked to complete a qualitative home and field contact checklist and participate in focus groups.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Crime
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Evaluation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a home environment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a misdemeanor offenses
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a offense classification
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a parole violation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a parolees
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a probation conditions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Probation officers
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Recidivism
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37172.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296786156
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 184003890X
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125120
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR37172
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
