|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1840038470 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20230325054947.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
230324s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR37840.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1840038470
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1840038470
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hamilton, Zachary
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Optimizing Juvenile Assessment Performance, United States, 2003-2019
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2021
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In nearly every state and in the vast majority of juvenile justice agencies, risk assessments are incorporated into diversion, case management, supervision, and placement practices. Despite two decades of use within the juvenile justice system, little research regarding the methods of risk assessment development is discussed or translated to the field and practitioners. Many of the contemporary tools used today are implemented off-the-shelf, meaning that tools were developed with a specific set of methods, selecting and weighting items used in the prediction of a specified sample of youth. What is not known is how the various designs, methods, and circumstances of tool development impact the predictive performance when adopted by a jurisdiction. This study seeks to provide input into this dilemma. Demographic information in this study includes age, race, and sex.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a criminal histories
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Drug use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Family Relations
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Family relationships
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Juvenile Crime
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Juvenile Justice
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Juvenile Offenders
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a juvenile recidivists
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a needs assessment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Recidivism prediction
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Risk assessment
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37840.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4296785710
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1840038470
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20230324125118
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR37840
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
