Waiver of Attorney in Juvenile Court, Massachusetts and Virginia, 2014-2018

The goal of this study is to examine age-based differences in knowledge and beliefs regarding the role of counsel, presumptions about counsel, and maturity of judgement when making decisions about whether to waive the right to counsel or the right to trial in a plea context. The study extends existi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woolard, Jennifer L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 2022
In:Year: 2022
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840036621
003 DE-627
005 20230325054934.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR37194.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840036621 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840036621 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Woolard, Jennifer L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Waiver of Attorney in Juvenile Court, Massachusetts and Virginia, 2014-2018 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The goal of this study is to examine age-based differences in knowledge and beliefs regarding the role of counsel, presumptions about counsel, and maturity of judgement when making decisions about whether to waive the right to counsel or the right to trial in a plea context. The study extends existing limited work on age-based differences in knowledge and decision making in several ways that improve ecological validity. The study examines knowledge, beliefs, and decisions among parent-youth pairs from the same family. This sampling strategy more closely approximates the real-life circumstances of waiver of counsel in which knowledge, beliefs, and decisions are nested and tested within family units. The dyadic analysis can offer insight into the challenges and opportunities that face youthful defendants at these critical junctures in case processing. It provides information about whether parents and youth understand these rights and whether assumptions that parents compensate for youths' lack of knowledge is reasonable. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a Adolescents 
650 4 |a attorneys 
650 4 |a Juvenile Justice 
650 4 |a legal proceedings 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37194.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296783815 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840036621 
LOK |0 005 20230324125110 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR37194 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw