Predicting Recidivism Risk Meets AI Act

Quantitative recidivism risk assessment can be used at the pretrial detention, trial, sentencing, and / or parole stage in the justice system. It has been criticized for what is measured, whether the predictions are more accurate than those made by humans, whether it creates or increases inequality...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dijck, Gijs van (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
En: European journal on criminal policy and research
Año: 2022, Volumen: 28, Número: 3, Páginas: 407-423
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1839951915
003 DE-627
005 20250112042112.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230323s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10610-022-09516-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1839951915 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1839951915 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |a Dijck, Gijs van  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1162345683  |0 (DE-627)1026004136  |0 (DE-576)334879183  |4 aut 
109 |a Dijck, Gijs van  |a Van Dijck, Gijs  |a Dijck, G. van 
245 1 0 |a Predicting Recidivism Risk Meets AI Act 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Quantitative recidivism risk assessment can be used at the pretrial detention, trial, sentencing, and / or parole stage in the justice system. It has been criticized for what is measured, whether the predictions are more accurate than those made by humans, whether it creates or increases inequality and discrimination, and whether it compromises or violates other aspects of fairness. This criticism becomes even more topical with the arrival of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. This article identifies and applies the relevant rules of the proposed AI Act in relation to quantitative recidivism risk assessment. It does so by focusing on the proposed rules for the quality of the data and the models used, on biases, and on the human oversight. It is concluded that legislation may consider requiring providers of high-risk AI systems to demonstrate that their solution performs significantly better than risk assessments based on simple models, and better than human assessment. Furthermore, there is no single answer to evaluate the performance of quantitative recidivism risk assessment tools that are or may be deployed in practice. Finally, three approaches of human oversight are discussed to correct for the negative effects of quantitative risk assessment: the optional, benchmark, and feedback approach. 
650 4 |a COMPAS 
650 4 |a OxRec 
650 4 |a Pre-trial detention 
650 4 |a Quantitative risk assessment 
650 4 |a Recidivism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal on criminal policy and research  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1993  |g 28(2022), 3, Seite 407-423  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320528197  |w (DE-600)2015435-5  |w (DE-576)121465713  |x 1572-9869  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:407-423 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10610-022-09516-8.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09516-8  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4295976881 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1839951915 
LOK |0 005 20230323160420 
LOK |0 008 230323||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw