The nature and role of morality in situational action theory
For situational action theory (SAT), morality is key to the definition of crime and the explanation for why and how acts of crime happen: acts of crime are acts of moral rule-breaking and personal morality guides individuals? perception of moral rule-breaking as an option before controls become rele...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| En: |
European journal of criminology
Año: 2022, Volumen: 19, Número: 6, Páginas: 1421-1437 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1839929243 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230323144316.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230323s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1477370820977099 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1839929243 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1839929243 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Barton-Crosby, Jennifer |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The nature and role of morality in situational action theory |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For situational action theory (SAT), morality is key to the definition of crime and the explanation for why and how acts of crime happen: acts of crime are acts of moral rule-breaking and personal morality guides individuals? perception of moral rule-breaking as an option before controls become relevant. However, the nature and role of morality in SAT can be misread. Within this article I respond to misinterpretations of the theory by elaborating and adding further context to the concept of morality in SAT. I contend that the root of misunderstanding is grounded in alternative assumptions regarding human nature: SAT assumes a fundamentally rule-guided human nature, whereas the prevailing view within criminology is that people are primarily self-interested. In this article I delineate SAT?s assumption of a rule-guided human nature and set out how this assumption informs the definition of crime and personal morality in the theory. I further specify the nature and role of morality in the perception of action alternatives, and in so doing distinguish SAT from theories that view constraint as the measure of morality. Finally, I develop and clarify SAT?s position on the relationship between morality and the law. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Morality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral emotions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral rules | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Situational Action Theory | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of criminology |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004 |g 19(2022), 6, Seite 1421-1437 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)379048256 |w (DE-600)2135314-1 |w (DE-576)112775543 |x 1741-2609 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g pages:1421-1437 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477370820977099 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820977099 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4295771228 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1839929243 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230323144316 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230323||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||