Sentencing Add-Ons and Implications for Disparities in a Guidelines State

This study examined whether and how discretionary sentencing add-ons (i.e., secondary charges, victim injury points, firearms/weapons points, drug trafficking enhancements) contribute to disparities. We examined add-ons that increase sentencing points and so contribute to a defendant ?scoring to pri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Strange, C. Clare (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Cochran, Joshua C. ; Wooldredge, John ; Feldmeyer, Ben
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2022
In: Crime & delinquency
Jahr: 2022, Band: 68, Heft: 9, Seiten: 1538-1578
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:
Incarceration
Race/ethnicity
Sentencing
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined whether and how discretionary sentencing add-ons (i.e., secondary charges, victim injury points, firearms/weapons points, drug trafficking enhancements) contribute to disparities. We examined add-ons that increase sentencing points and so contribute to a defendant ?scoring to prison.? We analyzed: (1) the degree to which add-ons explain racial and ethnic disparities in imprisonment (mediation); and (2) whether add-ons are more adverse for minority defendants (moderation). We did not find that add-ons ?explain? racial differences in the use of prison sentences. We did find, however, that some add-ons, particularly those that signal ?dangerousness,? are racially/ethnically disparate in their consequences. The findings raise questions about the role of court discretion in perpetuating racial and ethnic disparities.
ISSN:1552-387X
DOI:10.1177/00111287211047539