Does Convenience Come with a Price? The Impact of Remote Testimony on Perceptions of Expert Credibility
The purpose of the present study was to experimentally examine whether testimony modality leads to differences in perceptions of expert witnesses and their opinions. We hypothesized that simulated testimony delivered via phone would be perceived as less credible, efficacious, and assigned less weigh...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; ; ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Criminal justice and behavior
Year: 2023, Volume: 50, Issue: 2, Pages: 197-215 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1832161730 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230126005656.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230125s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00938548221087177 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1832161730 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1832161730 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jones, Ashley C. T. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does Convenience Come with a Price? The Impact of Remote Testimony on Perceptions of Expert Credibility |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of the present study was to experimentally examine whether testimony modality leads to differences in perceptions of expert witnesses and their opinions. We hypothesized that simulated testimony delivered via phone would be perceived as less credible, efficacious, and assigned less weight than testimony delivered via videoconference or in-court. We recruited a sample of 275 U.S. men and women via Amazon Mechanical Turk. After viewing a videotaped mock court scenario depicting testimony by a forensic psychological expert witness, participants completed measures of expert credibility, efficacy, and expert social presence. A simple contrast multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed perceptions did not differ between in-court, videoconferencing, and phone testimony conditions. Higher social presence scores predicted more favorable perceptions of the expert. These findings provide clearer support for the continued implementation of remote videoconference testimony in courts. We offer recommendations on how to optimize the use of remote testimony based on the present study and previous findings. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a forensic mental health assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Competency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expert Testimony | |
| 650 | 4 | |a VIDEOCONFERENCING | |
| 650 | 4 | |a remote testimony | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Batastini, Ashley B. |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)119270861X |0 (DE-627)1671208773 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patel, Meera B. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sacco, Donald F. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Warlick, Craig A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminal justice and behavior |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1974 |g 50(2023), 2, Seite 197-215 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306656345 |w (DE-600)1500128-3 |w (DE-576)081985487 |x 1552-3594 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2023 |g number:2 |g pages:197-215 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221087177 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4251231996 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1832161730 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230125051510 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-01-24#1F57CB060B9A99B360208F6786E43E029011E054 | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-02-05#1F57CB060B9A99B360208F6786E43E029011E054 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||