Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation

Purpose Metacognitive judgements of what another person would remember had they experienced a stimulus—that is social metamemory judgements, are likely to be important in evaluations of testimony in criminal and civil justice systems. This paper develops and tests predictions about two sources of er...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Helm, Rebecca K. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Growns, Bethany
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2023
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2023, Volumen: 28, Número: 1, Páginas: 15-33
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1830605704
003 DE-627
005 20230110051513.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230110s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12232  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1830605704 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1830605704 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Helm, Rebecca K.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Purpose Metacognitive judgements of what another person would remember had they experienced a stimulus—that is social metamemory judgements, are likely to be important in evaluations of testimony in criminal and civil justice systems. This paper develops and tests predictions about two sources of error in social metamemory judgements that have the potential to be important in legal contexts—errors resulting from beliefs informed by own memory being inappropriately applied to the memory of others, and errors resulting from differential experience of an underlying stimulus. Method We examined social metamemory judgements in two experimental studies. In Experiment 1 (N = 323), participants were required to make either social metamemory judgements relating to faces or predictions relating to their own memory for faces. In Experiment 2 (N = 275), we manipulated participant experience of faces, holding the described experience of the person whose memory was being assessed constant and asked participants to make social metamemory judgements. Results As predicted, judgements relating to the memory of others were prone to inaccuracy. Whilst participants making predictions relating to their own memory performed above chance, participants making social metamemory judgements performed no better than chance. Social metamemory judgements were also influenced by the way stimuli were experienced by an assessor, even where this experience did not correspond to the experience of the person whose memory they were assessing. Conclusions Having our own experiences of memory does not necessarily make us well-placed to assess the memory of others, and, in fact, our own experiences of memory can even be misleading in making judgements about the memory of others. 
650 4 |a social metamemory 
650 4 |a Perspective taking 
650 4 |a Metacognition 
650 4 |a Memory 
650 4 |a Juror decision making 
650 4 |a judgements of learning 
700 1 |a Growns, Bethany  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 28(2023), 1, Seite 15-33  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:15-33 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/lcrp.12232  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12232  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lcrp.12232  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4245327901 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1830605704 
LOK |0 005 20230110051513 
LOK |0 008 230110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-01-09#62276C6544D78485A5DD36207E1C922406C93EBC 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-01-13#62276C6544D78485A5DD36207E1C922406C93EBC 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-01-26#62276C6544D78485A5DD36207E1C922406C93EBC 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-02-10#62276C6544D78485A5DD36207E1C922406C93EBC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw