“Extremely Creepy, but Nothing he did was Illegal”: Charging Patterns During Prearrest Screening

We examine an approach to case screening where prosecutors screen requests for charges before a felony arrest is made. In 2016, Franklin County prosecutors declined to authorize arrests in 17.5% of felony cases. Declination rates, however, varied widely between offense types. Prosecutors most common...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lowrey-Kinberg, Belén (Author)
Contributors: Bowman, Rachel ; Gould, Jon
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Criminal justice policy review
Year: 2022, Volume: 33, Issue: 9, Pages: 918-942
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1820330516
003 DE-627
005 20221031221114.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221031s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/08874034221099604  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1820330516 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1820330516 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lowrey-Kinberg, Belén  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a “Extremely Creepy, but Nothing he did was Illegal”: Charging Patterns During Prearrest Screening 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We examine an approach to case screening where prosecutors screen requests for charges before a felony arrest is made. In 2016, Franklin County prosecutors declined to authorize arrests in 17.5% of felony cases. Declination rates, however, varied widely between offense types. Prosecutors most commonly did not authorize an arrest due to insufficient evidence, no crime having occurred, or follow-up needed. Among other findings, the cases of Black defendants, as compared to White defendants, were more likely to be declined due to insufficient evidence and additional follow-up needed. We conclude that prearrest screening by prosecutors can filter out weak cases early, increasing efficiency for the prosecutor’s office, saving the government money, and minimizing the impact of a “bad” arrest on a defendant. 
650 4 |a Prosecution 
650 4 |a felony screening 
650 4 |a charging decision 
700 1 |a Bowman, Rachel  |d 1988-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1238113664  |0 (DE-627)176532629X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gould, Jon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminal justice policy review  |d London : Sage, 1986  |g 33(2022), 9, Seite 918-942  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)33150796X  |w (DE-600)2051883-3  |w (DE-576)094502471  |x 1552-3586  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2022  |g number:9  |g pages:918-942 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034221099604  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 33  |j 2022  |e 9  |h 918-942 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4204171141 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1820330516 
LOK |0 005 20221031051640 
LOK |0 008 221031||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-30#1707CC9CFCACBFE65F3A5FB7B829CBD82012219A 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-14#1707CC9CFCACBFE65F3A5FB7B829CBD82012219A 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-24#1707CC9CFCACBFE65F3A5FB7B829CBD82012219A 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-07#E078000474DAAA07A4398ABBA70130EDFBACE7FE 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-18#E078000474DAAA07A4398ABBA70130EDFBACE7FE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw