Conditional dismissal as an alternative to the traditional criminal proceedings in Israel

The overloaded court system, along with the increasing recognition of the harm inflicted upon offenders by the criminal court procedure, led, in 2013, to the enactment of a new criminal-administrative procedure, termed “conditional dismissals,” which diverts minor offenses from the courts to be sett...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Shoham, Efrat (Author) ; Nicotra, Eitan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Criminology & criminal justice
Year: 2022, Volume: 22, Issue: 5, Pages: 694-713
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819843408
003 DE-627
005 20221025223959.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221025s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/17488958211004670  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819843408 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819843408 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Shoham, Efrat  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1072399431  |0 (DE-627)827381794  |0 (DE-576)188045694  |4 aut 
109 |a Shoham, Efrat  |a Šoham, Efrat  |a ŠHM, Efrat 
245 1 0 |a Conditional dismissal as an alternative to the traditional criminal proceedings in Israel 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The overloaded court system, along with the increasing recognition of the harm inflicted upon offenders by the criminal court procedure, led, in 2013, to the enactment of a new criminal-administrative procedure, termed “conditional dismissals,” which diverts minor offenses from the courts to be settled by prosecution authorities. This preliminary study examines the profile of 1750 cases of conditional dismissals concluded by district attorneys and police prosecution division between 2016 and 2018 and whether some notions of the “restorative justice” model were implemented. The findings indicate that both district attorneys and police prosecution division had initial difficulties in implementing the notion of diverting cases from the criminal court process. Over half of the cases in both agencies were for bodily injury and property offenses. There is a significant difference regarding the majority of the dismissal terms between the district attorneys and the police prosecution division. The results further indicate that 4.5% of all dismissals contained only restorative stipulations (especially in sex offenses), and one-third contained restorative stipulations along with punitive stipulations. The findings also show that the district attorneys are more inclined to use restorative terms, while the police prosecution division is more inclined to use punitive terms. The article discusses the possible explanations for these findings and the significant differences in the application of restorative practice between the police prosecution division and the district attorneys. 
650 4 |a Restorative Justice 
650 4 |a minor offenses 
650 4 |a diversionary programs 
650 4 |a crimes of poverty 
650 4 |a Conditional dismissal 
700 1 |a Nicotra, Eitan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & criminal justice  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006  |g 22(2022), 5, Seite 694-713  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)337806837  |w (DE-600)2063005-0  |w (DE-576)096290994  |x 1748-8966  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2022  |g number:5  |g pages:694-713 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211004670  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4201582698 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819843408 
LOK |0 005 20221025051638 
LOK |0 008 221025||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-24#2DB0244257AF4B56E8F17E775747DBE9B54A0C98 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-28#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-08#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-22#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-07#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-19#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-31#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw