Conditional dismissal as an alternative to the traditional criminal proceedings in Israel
The overloaded court system, along with the increasing recognition of the harm inflicted upon offenders by the criminal court procedure, led, in 2013, to the enactment of a new criminal-administrative procedure, termed “conditional dismissals,” which diverts minor offenses from the courts to be sett...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
In: |
Criminology & criminal justice
Year: 2022, Volume: 22, Issue: 5, Pages: 694-713 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1819843408 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221025223959.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221025s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/17488958211004670 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1819843408 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1819843408 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shoham, Efrat |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1072399431 |0 (DE-627)827381794 |0 (DE-576)188045694 |4 aut | |
109 | |a Shoham, Efrat |a Šoham, Efrat |a ŠHM, Efrat | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conditional dismissal as an alternative to the traditional criminal proceedings in Israel |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The overloaded court system, along with the increasing recognition of the harm inflicted upon offenders by the criminal court procedure, led, in 2013, to the enactment of a new criminal-administrative procedure, termed “conditional dismissals,” which diverts minor offenses from the courts to be settled by prosecution authorities. This preliminary study examines the profile of 1750 cases of conditional dismissals concluded by district attorneys and police prosecution division between 2016 and 2018 and whether some notions of the “restorative justice” model were implemented. The findings indicate that both district attorneys and police prosecution division had initial difficulties in implementing the notion of diverting cases from the criminal court process. Over half of the cases in both agencies were for bodily injury and property offenses. There is a significant difference regarding the majority of the dismissal terms between the district attorneys and the police prosecution division. The results further indicate that 4.5% of all dismissals contained only restorative stipulations (especially in sex offenses), and one-third contained restorative stipulations along with punitive stipulations. The findings also show that the district attorneys are more inclined to use restorative terms, while the police prosecution division is more inclined to use punitive terms. The article discusses the possible explanations for these findings and the significant differences in the application of restorative practice between the police prosecution division and the district attorneys. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Restorative Justice | |
650 | 4 | |a minor offenses | |
650 | 4 | |a diversionary programs | |
650 | 4 | |a crimes of poverty | |
650 | 4 | |a Conditional dismissal | |
700 | 1 | |a Nicotra, Eitan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminology & criminal justice |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006 |g 22(2022), 5, Seite 694-713 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)337806837 |w (DE-600)2063005-0 |w (DE-576)096290994 |x 1748-8966 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g pages:694-713 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211004670 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mkri | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4201582698 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1819843408 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221025051638 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221025||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-24#2DB0244257AF4B56E8F17E775747DBE9B54A0C98 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-28#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-08#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-22#F1707E3F104C9BE7250BF61AE6F7EFE6901EB194 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-07#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-19#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-12-31#56DB97CCE8B0D1BA58D96DDE284A16D8808AFCA0 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |