Email spam origins: does the CAN SPAM act shift spam beyond United States jurisdiction?
Spam is the sending of bulk, commercial, unsolicited electronic marketing messages. Today email spam makes up the majority of all email sent worldwide. The CAN SPAM Act is U.S. federal legislation that was passed in response to the growing spam problem. However, cybercrime such as email spam does no...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
14 October 2016
|
| En: |
Trends in organized crime
Año: 2018, Volumen: 21, Número: 1, Páginas: [62]-78 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1819342999 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221019125825.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221019s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12117-016-9289-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1819342999 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1819342999 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kigerl, Alex |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1167173635 |0 (DE-627)1030860610 |0 (DE-576)510639089 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Kigerl, Alex | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Email spam origins: does the CAN SPAM act shift spam beyond United States jurisdiction? |c Alex C. Kigerl |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Email spam origins: does the can spam act shift spam beyond United States jurisdiction? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 14 October 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Published: 14 October 2016 | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 77-78 | ||
| 520 | |a Spam is the sending of bulk, commercial, unsolicited electronic marketing messages. Today email spam makes up the majority of all email sent worldwide. The CAN SPAM Act is U.S. federal legislation that was passed in response to the growing spam problem. However, cybercrime such as email spam does not respect national borders, and spam can be sent from anywhere in the world, so it is questioned whether the CAN SPAM Act simply shifted spam beyond United States jurisdiction. The present research sought to address this question by analyzing the impact that prosecutions of spammers has had on a sample of 5,490,905 spam emails sent between 1998 and 2013. Two measures of spam nation of origin, U.S. IP address and U.S. domain name among spam emails, were created to assess the possible impact that the CAN SPAM Act might have had on the nation of origin associated with spam email messages. Results suggest a possible impact, with more ongoing CAN SPAM Act trials and media attention predicting less spam associated with the United States. CAN SPAM activity appeared to have the largest impact on US domain name registrations. Implications of the findings and suggestions for future research are discussed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cybercrime | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CAN SPAM Act | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deterrence | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Trends in organized crime |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1995 |g 21(2018), 1, Seite [62]-78 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)32051806X |w (DE-600)2014206-7 |w (DE-576)098304852 |x 1936-4830 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:[62]-78 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-016-9289-9 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4199166149 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1819342999 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240424073807 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||