How Restorative are You? Introducing the Restorative Index

Restorative justice (RJ) currently has no method of quantitatively determining if a program is restorative and assessing how restorative it may be. Due to confusion in RJ definitions and increased attention and funding in RJ, this gap has left RJ open to co-option by punitive systems. Co-option woul...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olson, Jeremy (Author)
Contributors: Sarver, Rebecca S.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Victims & offenders
Year: 2022, Volume: 17, Issue: 6, Pages: 941-973
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1814881085
003 DE-627
005 20220821051538.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220821s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15564886.2021.1942358  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1814881085 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1814881085 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Olson, Jeremy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How Restorative are You? Introducing the Restorative Index 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Restorative justice (RJ) currently has no method of quantitatively determining if a program is restorative and assessing how restorative it may be. Due to confusion in RJ definitions and increased attention and funding in RJ, this gap has left RJ open to co-option by punitive systems. Co-option would leave many interpersonal harms unrestored. The present paper reduces that co-option threat by introducing the Restorative Index (RI). We review the philosophy, definitions, and elements of RJ. We then translate those definitions and elements directly into the RI. We demonstrate ratings on the RI using an existing program. Use of the RI will improve program development, implementation, outcome assessments, and funding decisions. 
650 4 |a Intervention 
650 4 |a Offenders 
650 4 |a Victims 
650 4 |a Restorative Justice 
700 1 |a Sarver, Rebecca S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Victims & offenders  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2006  |g 17(2022), 6, Seite 941-973  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)512879672  |w (DE-600)2237556-9  |w (DE-576)272350850  |x 1556-4991  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2022  |g number:6  |g pages:941-973 
856 |u https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/resources/8f1de334-2a00-44c2-94f1-f41a5ab14c1b  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1942358  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4181655547 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1814881085 
LOK |0 005 20220821051538 
LOK |0 008 220821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-08-20#0F65282F34506DC952D2C76E31C73AB0C123C666 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw