Meeting the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Mandate: Lessons from State Assessments of Minority Overrepresentation and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Juvenile Justice Systems
Effective as of October 2019, the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Mandate requires states to address racial/ethnic disparities in their juvenile justice systems without reference to any numerical standards or a definition of disparity in empirical terms. Standards for assessing disproportion...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of crime and justice
Year: 2022, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 363-380 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1814282084 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220813051557.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220813s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0735648X.2021.1952102 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1814282084 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1814282084 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Donnelly, Ellen A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Meeting the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Mandate: Lessons from State Assessments of Minority Overrepresentation and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Juvenile Justice Systems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Effective as of October 2019, the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Mandate requires states to address racial/ethnic disparities in their juvenile justice systems without reference to any numerical standards or a definition of disparity in empirical terms. Standards for assessing disproportionate minority contact have also gotten looser, as the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) announced that states should evaluate DMC problems and interventions based on their own metrics of success. Understanding how states have examined minority overrepresentation and disparities in their systems in the past helps to structure what states might do in terms of DMC assessment in the near future. This study analyzes 39 state assessments on behalf of the DMC mandate from 1992 to 2019. A content analysis locates patterns in methods, racial/ethnic categories, decision-making stages, geographic coverage, and recommendations for future reform efforts. Frequent use of multivariate methods and qualitative techniques, such as surveys, focus groups, and interviews, suggests that assessments are empirically rich. Most assessments likewise contain directions for reform initiatives and analysis in subsequent DMC reports. Lessons are drawn for designing robust DMC assessments for states and illuminating racial/ethnic disparities in juvenile processing ahead. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Disparity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a DMC mandate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disproportionate minority contact | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Asiedu, Christen O. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of crime and justice |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1984 |g 45(2022), 3, Seite 363-380 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)654743452 |w (DE-600)2599262-4 |w (DE-576)352346353 |x 2158-9119 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:363-380 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1952102 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4178918338 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1814282084 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220813051557 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220813||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-08-12#C671DE2128860A81F4F6C33109749FACD536C1F1 | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-09-09#C671DE2128860A81F4F6C33109749FACD536C1F1 | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-06#C671DE2128860A81F4F6C33109749FACD536C1F1 | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-24#C671DE2128860A81F4F6C33109749FACD536C1F1 | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-10-31#7F92FD410B289DFB1C146DF96C0A353A83B08A8C | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-10#7F92FD410B289DFB1C146DF96C0A353A83B08A8C | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-11-22#7F92FD410B289DFB1C146DF96C0A353A83B08A8C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||