APA (7th ed.) Citation

Copp, J. E., Blomberg, T. G., Casey, W. M., & Pesta, G. ([2022]). Pretrial risk assessment instruments in practice: The role of judicial discretion in pretrial reform. Criminology & public policy, 21(2), 329-358. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12575

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Copp, Jennifer E., Thomas G. Blomberg, William M. Casey, and George Pesta. "Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments in Practice: The Role of Judicial Discretion in Pretrial Reform." Criminology & Public Policy 21, no. 2 ([2022]): 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12575.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Copp, Jennifer E., et al. "Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments in Practice: The Role of Judicial Discretion in Pretrial Reform." Criminology & Public Policy, vol. 21, no. 2, [2022], pp. 329-358, https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12575.