Cita APA (7a ed.)

Copp, J. E., Blomberg, T. G., Casey, W. M., & Pesta, G. (2022). Pretrial risk assessment instruments in practice: The role of judicial discretion in pretrial reform. Criminology & public policy, 21(2), 329-358. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12575

Cita Chicago Style (17a ed.)

Copp, Jennifer E., Thomas G. Blomberg, William M. Casey, y George Pesta. "Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments in Practice: The Role of Judicial Discretion in Pretrial Reform." Criminology & Public Policy 21, no. 2 (2022): 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12575.

Cita MLA (8a ed.)

Copp, Jennifer E., et al. "Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments in Practice: The Role of Judicial Discretion in Pretrial Reform." Criminology & Public Policy, vol. 21, no. 2, 2022, pp. 329-358, https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12575.

Precaución: Estas citas no son 100% exactas.