Perceptions of campaign donors and their impact on judgments of judicial fairness

Perceptions of judicial fairness for elected state judges were examined across a series of studies. Of particular interest was how campaign donations and types of cases affect perceptions that judges could be fair. In Study 1, participants (N = 120) rated the political orientation of 14 groups or co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunez, Narina (Autor) ; Schweitzer, Kimberly (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
En: Psychology, crime & law
Año: 2022, Volumen: 28, Número: 3, Páginas: 289-314
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1797405667
003 DE-627
005 20220406093530.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220403s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1909014  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1797405667 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1797405667 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Nunez, Narina  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Perceptions of campaign donors and their impact on judgments of judicial fairness 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Perceptions of judicial fairness for elected state judges were examined across a series of studies. Of particular interest was how campaign donations and types of cases affect perceptions that judges could be fair. In Study 1, participants (N = 120) rated the political orientation of 14 groups or companies known to provide campaign contributions and rated how fair judges could be if they received donations from these entities. In Study 2, participants read about a judge who received donations from a liberal or conservative political action committee (N = 190) or corporation (N = 188). Study 3 (N = 809) tested whether judicial recusal in conflicted cases could repair perceptions of judicial fairness. Individual differences in participant political orientation were also examined. Across all studies, participants rated judges as less fair when they received donations during their campaigns and later heard cases that were clearly related to donors’ interests. Significant interactions between participant and donor political orientation were found. Generally, liberal participants thought judges would be less fair when donors were conservative, and conservative participants thought judges would be less fair when donors were liberal. Finally, judicial recusal led to higher future fairness ratings. 
650 4 |a Judicial recusal 
650 4 |a Judicial fairness 
650 4 |a Political Orientation 
650 4 |a Campaign donations 
650 4 |a Judicial legitimacy 
700 1 |a Schweitzer, Kimberly  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 28(2022), 3, Seite 289-314  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:289-314 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1909014  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4111707440 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1797405667 
LOK |0 005 20220403051601 
LOK |0 008 220403||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-04-02#C4F372242EC6292E774497F23DAC0A9D47818A92 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw