Access to justice in clientelist networks

Despite its importance for poverty reduction, the poor face barriers when accessing justice. However, the literature, looking mostly at developed countries, focuses on the institutional underpinnings of these restrictions, and thus ignores social structural barriers. This paper deals with one type o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shami, Mahvish (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
En: The British journal of criminology
Año: 2022, Volumen: 62, Número: 2, Páginas: 337-358
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1794185291
003 DE-627
005 20220301153750.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220301s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/azab056  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1794185291 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1794185291 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Shami, Mahvish  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Access to justice in clientelist networks  |c Mahvish Shami 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Despite its importance for poverty reduction, the poor face barriers when accessing justice. However, the literature, looking mostly at developed countries, focuses on the institutional underpinnings of these restrictions, and thus ignores social structural barriers. This paper deals with one type of social barrier; clientelism and its impact on poor clients’ access to justice. I argue that asymmetric power distribution enables patrons to bar clients from accessing formal institutions. Such barriers can’t be rectified through institutional reforms. Making use of an original dataset from Pakistan this paper recommends an unorthodox policy solution; increasing connectivity. I demonstrate how exit options, brought about through connectivity, alter bargaining powers, thereby limiting patrons’ ability to block clients from accessing formal justice institutions. 
650 4 |a Social barriers to justice 
650 4 |a Clientelism 
651 4 |a Pakistan 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960  |g 62(2022), 2, Seite 337-358  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271175559  |w (DE-600)1478955-3  |w (DE-576)079718906  |x 1464-3529  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:337-358 
856 |u https://academic.oup.com/bjc/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/bjc/azab056/40545220/azab056.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u http://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab056  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4076492897 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1794185291 
LOK |0 005 20231102095825 
LOK |0 008 220301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw