Do you hear what I hear?: A comparison of police officer and civilian fairness judgments through procedural justice

Procedural justice theory posits that people care at least as much about how a decision was made as they do about the outcome. Although policymakers and researchers argue that procedural justice-based interventions can improve police-civilian interactions, little research has examined how authoritie...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hazen, Katherine P. (Author) ; Brank, Eve M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2022, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 153-178
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1787760235
003 DE-627
005 20220204082645.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220129s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1900179  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1787760235 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1787760235 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hazen, Katherine P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Do you hear what I hear?: A comparison of police officer and civilian fairness judgments through procedural justice 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Procedural justice theory posits that people care at least as much about how a decision was made as they do about the outcome. Although policymakers and researchers argue that procedural justice-based interventions can improve police-civilian interactions, little research has examined how authorities evaluate decision-making processes. This research examined whether police officers and civilians evaluate fairness in police-civilian encounters through the same mechanisms. 69 police officer and 113 civilian participants, recruited through Qualtrics professional panels and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk respectively, read a vignette describing a police-civilian interaction in which the civilian explained why they violated the law (procedural justice) or were interrupted by the officer (procedural injustice) and made evaluations of the interaction. Multiple-group analyses using bootstrapping revealed that both police officers and civilians rated the procedural justice condition as more fair because they rated the officer as more respectful and trustworthy and because they perceived the civilian had more voice than in the procedural injustice condition. Further, direct and indirect pathways through respect were not present when police officer pathways were allowed to vary, suggesting police may rely on social information differently than civilians. 
650 4 |a Voice 
650 4 |a Structural Equation Modeling 
650 4 |a Police-civilian interactions 
650 4 |a Police 
650 4 |a Procedural Justice 
700 1 |a Brank, Eve M.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1122490534  |0 (DE-627)875706452  |0 (DE-576)481347585  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 28(2022), 2, Seite 153-178  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:153-178 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1900179  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2022  |e 2  |h 153-178 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4047953946 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1787760235 
LOK |0 005 20220129061558 
LOK |0 008 220129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-01-28#75D259FE6362CB7170581B2D35C97EE089039FB0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw