RT Article
T1 Dots versus density: the impact of crime mapping techniques on perception of safety, police performance and neighbourhood quality
JF Policing and society
VO 32
IS 1
SP 1
OP 17
A1 Wuschke, Kathryn
A2 Henning, Kris
A2 Stewart, Gregory
LA English
YR 2022
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1785942328
AB President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing advised law enforcement agencies to ‘[e]stablish a culture of transparency and accountability in order to build public trust and legitimacy’ (2015, p. 12). Such transparency and accountability may be promoted through increased public access to crime data and measures of police activity. The inherently geographic nature of crime has made online maps one of the more popular strategies for disseminating this information to the public. As more agencies deliver crime maps on their own, or hosted websites, it becomes important for social scientists to evaluate how these communications affect public perceptions. Crime mapping is a complex process requiring many decisions. This includes choices about the type of crime to include or exclude, the type of map used, and numerous design features for the map itself. The field of critical cartography argues that all of these decisions have the potential to shape perceptions about a given geographic location, the people living there, and, in the present context, the people charged with maintaining public safety in the area. This study investigates whether different types of maps (i.e. dot vs. density) affect individual perceptions of safety, police performance and neighbourhood quality. Results indicate that the type of crime map viewed does alter perceptions, illustrating a need for careful and consistent decision-making when preparing crime maps for public access.
K1 Law Enforcement
K1 Fear of crime
K1 Public perceptions
K1 Crime Mapping
DO 10.1080/10439463.2021.1874950