Concealed Carrying on Campus in the Post–Virginia Tech Era: Dimensions of State Regulation and Differences in Contexts of Influence Within Them

Debates over concealed carrying of guns on campus (CCOC) usually classify states as either “allowing” or “prohibiting” CCOC, thus ignoring research revealing state firearm regulatory frameworks are more nuanced. This study examined whether such subtleties existed in state CCOC regulatory frameworks...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sloan, John J. (Author) ; Fisher, Bonnie S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Criminal justice policy review
Year: 2022, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-73
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Contexts of influence
Guns on campus
State gun policy
College campuses
Concealed carrying

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783529474
003 DE-627
005 20211223105657.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211223s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/08874034211028276  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783529474 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783529474 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sloan, John J.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1104746387  |0 (DE-627)862146518  |0 (DE-576)165225769  |4 aut 
109 |a Sloan, John J.  |a Sloan, John Joseph 
245 1 0 |a Concealed Carrying on Campus in the Post–Virginia Tech Era: Dimensions of State Regulation and Differences in Contexts of Influence Within Them 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Debates over concealed carrying of guns on campus (CCOC) usually classify states as either “allowing” or “prohibiting” CCOC, thus ignoring research revealing state firearm regulatory frameworks are more nuanced. This study examined whether such subtleties existed in state CCOC regulatory frameworks by analyzing states’ 2018 CCOC regulatory provisions. Results showed that states used a multi-categorical restrictiveness-by-institutional discretion framework to regulate CCOC. In addition, indicators of intrastate contexts of influence (firearms, political, and religious) on regulatory policy differed across categories of restrictiveness and institutional discretion. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significant differences in indicators of states’ political contexts, and post hoc comparisons of paired marginal means revealed significant differences in political indicators between states prohibiting CCOC and those allowing or those with mixed restrictiveness, and between states according schools full discretion and those according schools no discretion. Implications of the results are discussed for state-level research on firearms regulation and the ongoing CCOC debate. 
650 4 |a Contexts of influence 
650 4 |a Guns on campus 
650 4 |a State gun policy 
650 4 |a College campuses 
650 4 |a Concealed carrying 
700 1 |a Fisher, Bonnie S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminal justice policy review  |d London : Sage, 1986  |g 33(2022), 1, Seite 45-73  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)33150796X  |w (DE-600)2051883-3  |w (DE-576)094502471  |x 1552-3586  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:45-73 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211028276  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4026371530 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783529474 
LOK |0 005 20211223061534 
LOK |0 008 211223||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-12-22#95F290E0F2BAAB5A8A285DD9455F8BC26D13C541 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw