Implicit bias within public reporting: a virtual reality experiment examining “suspicious” activity
Campaigns like that of the Department of Homeland Security’s “See Something, Say Something” are intended to increase public reporting of “terrorism-related behaviors.” Yet given prior research on whom the general public considers to be a terrorist, it is likely these types of programs are instead af...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| In: |
Crime & delinquency
Year: 2021, Volume: 67, Issue: 12, Pages: 2135-2162 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| Summary: | Campaigns like that of the Department of Homeland Security’s “See Something, Say Something” are intended to increase public reporting of “terrorism-related behaviors.” Yet given prior research on whom the general public considers to be a terrorist, it is likely these types of programs are instead affected by pejorative automatic associations. With this in mind, we inquire: Does implicit bias affect public reporting within a suspicious activity scenario? Through a randomized experiment using virtual reality technology, we find evidence of such bias, as manifested in whether participants indicated they would call the police when presented with a Middle Eastern male. We conclude effective counterterrorism programming should involve an awareness campaign component detailing what terrorism truly looks like in the United States. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1552-387X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0011128720981897 |
