Custody visiting: The watchdog that didn’t bark
This article argues that in qualitative research into the work of a regulator, it is as important to watch out for that regulator’s omissions and silences as it is to examine what the regulator does and says. The argument is illustrated by data drawn from a study of the Independent Custody Visiting...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
| In: |
Criminology & criminal justice
Jahr: 2022, Band: 22, Heft: 1, Seiten: 115-131 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1780481306 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211210115022.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211207s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1748895820967989 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1780481306 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1780481306 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kendall, John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Custody visiting: The watchdog that didn’t bark |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article argues that in qualitative research into the work of a regulator, it is as important to watch out for that regulator’s omissions and silences as it is to examine what the regulator does and says. The argument is illustrated by data drawn from a study of the Independent Custody Visiting Scheme, the purpose of which is (or should be) to safeguard detainees and to deter police from misconduct which might lead to deaths in custody. Research into the scheme included using the technique of watching out for what the visitors did not do and did not say. The data obtained by this method are interpreted through the lens of Lukes’ theory of power to suggest that this watchdog has been debarked as a result of the power of the police. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Regulator | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Police | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Omissions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Observation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Custody visitor | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminology & criminal justice |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006 |g 22(2022), 1, Seite 115-131 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)337806837 |w (DE-600)2063005-0 |w (DE-576)096290994 |x 1748-8966 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:115-131 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1748895820967989 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820967989 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4015072480 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1780481306 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211207061545 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211207||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-12-06#4AD5EE50BE302CAB61DC51BE955A3A240E962ACE | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||