Combining Static and Dynamic Recidivism Risk Information Into the Five-Level Risk and Needs System: A New Zealand Example

Communicating recidivism risk is individualized to each assessment. Labels (e.g., high, low) have no standardized meaning. In 2017, the Council of State Governments Justice Center (CSGJC) proposed a framework for standardized communication, but balancing the framework’s underlying principles of effe...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coulter, Darcy J. (Author)
Contributors: Lloyd, Caleb D. ; Serin, Ralph C.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Criminal justice and behavior
Year: 2022, Volume: 49, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-97
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1779909675
003 DE-627
005 20211210073237.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211201s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/00938548211033319  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779909675 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779909675 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Coulter, Darcy J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Combining Static and Dynamic Recidivism Risk Information Into the Five-Level Risk and Needs System: A New Zealand Example 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Communicating recidivism risk is individualized to each assessment. Labels (e.g., high, low) have no standardized meaning. In 2017, the Council of State Governments Justice Center (CSGJC) proposed a framework for standardized communication, but balancing the framework’s underlying principles of effective risk communication (and merging static and dynamic information) adds complexity. In this study, we incorporated dynamic risk scores that case managers rated among a routine sample of adults on parole in New Zealand (N = 440) with static risk scores into the Five-Level Risk and Needs System. Compared with static risk only, merging tools (a) enhanced concordance with the recidivism rates proposed by CSGJC for average and lower-risk individuals, (b) diminished concordance for higher-risk individuals, yet (c) improved conceptual alignment with the criminogenic needs domain of the system. This example highlights the importance of attending to the underlying principles of effective risk communication that motivated the development of the system. 
650 4 |a Static risk 
650 4 |a Dynamic risk 
650 4 |a Standardized language 
650 4 |a Risk communication 
650 4 |a DRAOR 
700 1 |a Lloyd, Caleb D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Serin, Ralph C.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1093573554  |0 (DE-627)853785716  |0 (DE-576)183666879  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminal justice and behavior  |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1974  |g 49(2022), 1, Seite 77-97  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306656345  |w (DE-600)1500128-3  |w (DE-576)081985487  |x 1552-3594  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:77-97 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211033319  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 49  |j 2022  |e 1  |h 77-97 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4010276347 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779909675 
LOK |0 005 20211201061535 
LOK |0 008 211201||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-11-30#818C72729E0B0902BA56252B2D1B0F51F6810D4E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw