Offence associated proactive, reactive, and acquisitive attributions that inform theory, assessment, and intervention

This study examines the reliability and validity of proactive (cold-blooded, instrumental), reactive (hot-blooded, affective), and acquisitive (securing goods of others) crime-related attributional domains associated with specific offence-based categories. Using samples from minimum security (n = 11...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Kroner, Daryl G. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [2020]
In: Journal of crime and justice
Jahr: 2020, Band: 43, Heft: 5, Seiten: 659-675
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1779785275
003 DE-627
005 20211129152119.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211129s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0735648X.2020.1738952  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1779785275 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1779785275 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kroner, Daryl G.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1192709160  |0 (DE-627)1671210506  |4 aut 
109 |a Kroner, Daryl G. 
245 1 0 |a Offence associated proactive, reactive, and acquisitive attributions that inform theory, assessment, and intervention 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This study examines the reliability and validity of proactive (cold-blooded, instrumental), reactive (hot-blooded, affective), and acquisitive (securing goods of others) crime-related attributional domains associated with specific offence-based categories. Using samples from minimum security (n = 116), medium security (n = 102) and parole (n = 116), construct validity of the Proactive, Reactive, and Acquisitive scales was assessed with response latencies, criterion validity with past offending, and predictive validity with future offending. Response latencies for endorsed items discriminated better between the Proactive and Reactive scales than between the Reactive and Acquisitive scales. The Proactive, Reactive, and Acquisitive scales had stronger relationships with their corresponding offense category that with non-corresponding scale and offence-based category. The Acquisitive scale uniquely predicted acquisitive offences. The results support a basic distinction between the Proactive, Reactive, and Acquisitive scales. Implications of the results include using skill-based intervention methods for elevated Proactive scores, affective-based interventions for elevated Reactive scores, and rational choice techniques for elevated Acquisitive scores. 
650 4 |a Criminal Attribution Inventory 
650 4 |a Proactive 
650 4 |a Acquisitive 
650 4 |a Reactive 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of crime and justice  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1984  |g 43(2020), 5, Seite 659-675  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)654743452  |w (DE-600)2599262-4  |w (DE-576)352346353  |x 2158-9119  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:659-675 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1738952  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 43  |j 2020  |e 5  |h 659-675 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4008889051 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1779785275 
LOK |0 005 20211129152119 
LOK |0 008 211129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw