Crime witness accounts

Contrary to the social expectation that good citizens should help others in need, persons who witness crime do not always intervene to help, or see it as their responsibility to do so. This study explores the reasons why witnesses choose not to call police or help in other ways by elucidating the ac...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Weiss, Karen G. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Theoretical criminology
Year: 2021, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 663-681
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1778198651
003 DE-627
005 20220208103714.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211121s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1362480620918326  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1778198651 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1778198651 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Weiss, Karen G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Weiss, Karen G. 
245 1 0 |a Crime witness accounts 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Contrary to the social expectation that good citizens should help others in need, persons who witness crime do not always intervene to help, or see it as their responsibility to do so. This study explores the reasons why witnesses choose not to call police or help in other ways by elucidating the accounts that nonintervening witnesses use to convince others and themselves that intervention was not necessary or appropriate. Drawing from open-ended survey responses, five neutralizing accounts are identified, two that deny the intervenability of crime (by denying harm or blaming victims), and three that deny responsibility to help (by denying capability, asserting risk, or rejecting a guardianship role). Identifying the accounts that normalize crime and make it easier for witnesses to “do nothing” contributes to a more nuanced understanding of witness decision making and nonintervening responses that, in turn, can contribute to the persistence of crime. 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4135890-9  |0 (DE-627)105661716  |0 (DE-576)209664568  |a Zeugenaussage  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4062653-2  |0 (DE-627)106130862  |0 (DE-576)209145358  |a Verbrechen  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4067701-1  |0 (DE-627)106108034  |0 (DE-576)209170964  |a Zeuge  |2 gnd 
650 4 |a Victim blaming 
650 4 |a Reporting to police 
650 4 |a Neutralization 
650 4 |a Crime witnessing 
650 4 |a Capable guardianship 
650 4 |a Accounts 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theoretical criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1997  |g 25(2021), 4, Seite 663-681  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320645681  |w (DE-600)2025383-7  |w (DE-576)098253387  |x 1461-7439  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:663-681 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620918326  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4004426022 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1778198651 
LOK |0 005 20211121061637 
LOK |0 008 211121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-11-20#50DFECD6F14913003DA285C76E8808E39C6C491A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw