Remand decision-making in the youth court: a comparative analysis of youth remand and bail in England & Wales and the Netherlands

This article presents the findings of an in-depth comparative study of remand decision-making in youth courts in England & Wales and the Netherlands. Informed by qualitative empirical research, this article explores differences and similarities in remand decision-making and in the functions of r...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brink, Yannick van den (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
En: International journal of law, crime and justice
Año: 2021, Volumen: 66
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1776511751
003 DE-627
005 20231109093413.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211109s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100487  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776511751 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776511751 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Brink, Yannick van den  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Remand decision-making in the youth court  |b a comparative analysis of youth remand and bail in England & Wales and the Netherlands  |c Yannick van den Brink 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article presents the findings of an in-depth comparative study of remand decision-making in youth courts in England & Wales and the Netherlands. Informed by qualitative empirical research, this article explores differences and similarities in remand decision-making and in the functions of remand in the administration of youth justice. A key finding is that in Dutch youth justice a paternalistic and interventionist perception of the ‘welfare principle’ seems to be an important informal driver of the (relatively) high youth remand rates, whereas in the English youth justice system the ‘welfare principle’ seems to function rather as a protective mechanism against an overzealous use of youth remand. Ultimately, the article explores how different legal traditions and ‘proximal processes’ might explain and shape cross-national differences in the use of remand for youth and identifies several areas for further inquiry that can potentially advance our broader international comparative understanding of youth remand practices. 
650 4 |a Remand 
650 4 |a Pre-trail detention 
650 4 |a Bail 
650 4 |a youth court 
650 4 |a Comparative Research 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of law, crime and justice  |d Oxford : Elsevier, 2008  |g 66(2021), Artikel-ID 100487  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)559427743  |w (DE-600)2412511-8  |w (DE-576)278242537  |x 1756-0616  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:66  |g year:2021  |g elocationid:100487 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100487  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100487  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000251759 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776511751 
LOK |0 005 20211109151623 
LOK |0 008 211109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw