Resiliences to radicalization: four key perspectives

Building resilience to radicalization has become a key pillar of many policies for preventing violent extremism. However, sustained debates over the precise nature of the terms radicalisation and resilience impact the ability to implement these policies. A growing body of literature argues that the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Stephens, William (Author) ; Sieckelinck, Stijn 1980- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: International journal of law, crime and justice
Year: 2021, Volume: 66
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1776504194
003 DE-627
005 20231109093401.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211109s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100486  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1776504194 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1776504194 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Stephens, William  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Resiliences to radicalization  |b four key perspectives  |c WilliamStephens, Stijn Sieckelinck 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Building resilience to radicalization has become a key pillar of many policies for preventing violent extremism. However, sustained debates over the precise nature of the terms radicalisation and resilience impact the ability to implement these policies. A growing body of literature argues that the way in which key ideas are understood matters to what happens in practice. Additionally, the cross-sector collaboration called for in PVE policy can be made more challenging through divergences in understanding of central concepts. As such, the way in which resilience to radicalization is being understood by frontline workers matters. In light of this, a q-methodology study was conducted, which identified four perspectives on resilience to radicalization amongst policy-makers and practitioners in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK. These perspectives are examined in light of the broader debates around both resilience and radicalization, and the extent to which the divergences matter for collaboration is considered. 
650 4 |a Resilience 
650 4 |a Radicalization 
650 4 |a Q-methodology 
650 4 |a P/CVE 
650 4 |a Collaboration 
700 1 |a Sieckelinck, Stijn  |d 1980-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1194028187  |0 (DE-627)1675771588  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of law, crime and justice  |d Oxford : Elsevier, 2008  |g 66(2021), Artikel-ID 100486  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)559427743  |w (DE-600)2412511-8  |w (DE-576)278242537  |x 1756-0616  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:66  |g year:2021  |g elocationid:100486 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100486  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100486  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4000221299 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1776504194 
LOK |0 005 20211109151049 
LOK |0 008 211109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw