Public perceptions of felon-juror exclusion: An exploratory study
Despite the pervasiveness of felon-juror exclusion, this is the first study to systematically explore public opinions about the exclusion of convicted felons from voting and jury service. While results from 815 Californians revealed greater support for felon-voters than for felon-jurors, a majority...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
In: |
Criminology & criminal justice
Jahr: 2021, Band: 21, Heft: 5, Seiten: 593-613 |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1772238260 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211013081348.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211004s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1748895819898518 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1772238260 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1772238260 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Binnall, James M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public perceptions of felon-juror exclusion: An exploratory study |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Despite the pervasiveness of felon-juror exclusion, this is the first study to systematically explore public opinions about the exclusion of convicted felons from voting and jury service. While results from 815 Californians revealed greater support for felon-voters than for felon-jurors, a majority opposed felon-juror exclusion and rejected the rationales for doing so. Findings also revealed stark ideological divides, as conservatives were less likely to support felon-voters or felon-jurors, and were more likely to endorse the justifications for felon-juror exclusion. As states debate legislation permitting felon-juror inclusion, our findings indicate that support for such policies is likely greater than courts and policymakers had previously thought, suggesting that officials might benefit from re-considering whether this form of civic marginalization actually represents the will of the people. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Public Opinion | |
650 | 4 | |a Political Ideology | |
650 | 4 | |a felon-voter | |
650 | 4 | |a felon-juror | |
650 | 4 | |a Convicted felons | |
700 | 1 | |a Petersen, Nick |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminology & criminal justice |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006 |g 21(2021), 5, Seite 593-613 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)337806837 |w (DE-600)2063005-0 |w (DE-576)096290994 |x 1748-8966 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2021 |g number:5 |g pages:593-613 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819898518 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mkri | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3983233279 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1772238260 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211004061633 | ||
LOK | |0 008 211004||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-10-03#193A827B050410DC7DA130448EC620C1D8F17DD0 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |