Are Protective Factors Valid Constructs? Interrater Reliability And Construct Validity Of Proposed Protective Factors Against Sexual Reoffending
Most sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus primarily on risk factors and deficits without consideration for strengths or protective factors which might mitigate reoffense risk. The current study is the first in a research program designed to develop and validate the Structured Assessment of...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
In: |
Criminal justice and behavior
Year: 2020, Volume: 47, Issue: 11, Pages: 1448-1467 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1768412391 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210902115651.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210902s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0093854820941039 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1768412391 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1768412391 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Willis, Gwenda M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Are Protective Factors Valid Constructs? Interrater Reliability And Construct Validity Of Proposed Protective Factors Against Sexual Reoffending |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Most sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus primarily on risk factors and deficits without consideration for strengths or protective factors which might mitigate reoffense risk. The current study is the first in a research program designed to develop and validate the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk—Sexual Offence version (SAPROF-SO), a measure of protective factors against sexual reoffending. The study aimed to test interrater reliability and construct validity of the SAPROF-SO with a high-risk (n = 40) and routine (n = 40) sample. Interrater reliability between three independent raters was generally good to excellent for the SAPROF-SO domain and Total scores across both samples and compared favorably with validated measures of dynamic risk. Moreover, the SAPROF-SO demonstrated construct validity and was moderately independent of existing measures of risk. Findings open the door for a more balanced, strengths-based, and accurate approach to recidivism risk assessment. | ||
650 | 4 | |a SAPROF | |
650 | 4 | |a Desistance | |
650 | 4 | |a Protective factors | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Sexual Offending | |
700 | 1 | |a Kelley, Sharon M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Thornton, David |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-627)1236717635 |0 (DE-576)166717630 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminal justice and behavior |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1974 |g 47(2020), 11, Seite 1448-1467 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306656345 |w (DE-600)1500128-3 |w (DE-576)081985487 |x 1552-3594 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2020 |g number:11 |g pages:1448-1467 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854820941039 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 47 |j 2020 |e 11 |h 1448-1467 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3972513909 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1768412391 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210902115651 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210902||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |