Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited

In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Burton, Alexander L. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Cullen, Francis T. 1951- ; Burton, Velmer S. ; Butler, Leah C. ; Graham, Amanda ; Thielo, Angela J.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
In: Criminal justice and behavior
Jahr: 2020, Band: 47, Heft: 6, Seiten: 712-732
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:
Attitudes
Corrections
Public Opinion
Punitiveness
Redeemability
Rehabilitation
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability is negatively related to punitive attitudes. In addition, the analyses reveal that this belief predicts support for rehabilitation and specific inclusionary policies (i.e., ban-the-box in employment, expungement of criminal records, and voting rights for people with a felony conviction). Findings regarding measures for punishment and rehabilitation were confirmed by a 2019 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) survey. These results suggest that beliefs about capacity for change among people who committed offenses are key to understanding crime-control public policy.
ISSN:1552-3594
DOI:10.1177/0093854820913585