Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited

In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, Alexander L. (Autor) ; Cullen, Francis T. 1951- (Autor) ; Burton, Velmer S. (Autor) ; Butler, Leah C. (Autor) ; Graham, Amanda (Autor) ; Thielo, Angela J. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: Criminal justice and behavior
Año: 2020, Volumen: 47, Número: 6, Páginas: 712-732
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Attitudes
Corrections
Public Opinion
Punitiveness
Redeemability
Rehabilitation
Descripción
Sumario:In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability is negatively related to punitive attitudes. In addition, the analyses reveal that this belief predicts support for rehabilitation and specific inclusionary policies (i.e., ban-the-box in employment, expungement of criminal records, and voting rights for people with a felony conviction). Findings regarding measures for punishment and rehabilitation were confirmed by a 2019 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) survey. These results suggest that beliefs about capacity for change among people who committed offenses are key to understanding crime-control public policy.
ISSN:1552-3594
DOI:10.1177/0093854820913585